ILNews

On the Move - 7/6/11

IL Staff
July 6, 2011
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
On The Move

On The Move: Information must be submitted at least 11 days prior to the Wednesday issue in which the announcement will appear. Digital images should be 200 dpi and saved as eps, tiff or jpeg. Color images are preferred. For more information or to submit an announcement, contact managing editor Kelly Lucas at klucas@ibj.com

New Associations
Diane Gianos has joined Ice Miller as a partner in the firm’s Chicago and DuPage office. She is a member of the firm’s labor and employment practice group.

Jason D. Schultz and Kurt M. Eaton have joined Krieg DeVault as associates in the firm’s Indianapolis office. Schultz is a member of the firm’s health care practice, and Eaton is in the firm’s intellectual property and technology practice, focusing on patent law. Jude Anne Carluccio has joined Krieg DeVault in an of-counsel capacity in the firm’s employee benefits and executive compensation and employee stock ownership plans practice groups. She will establish the firm’s legal presence in Minneapolis, Minn.

J. Eric Davis and J.R. Hensley have joined Indianapolis firm Alerding Castor Hewitt in an of-counsel capacity, serving as advisers to start-up businesses and sports organizations.

Jessica Benson Cox has joined Baker & Daniels as an associate in the firm’s downtown Indianapolis office. She is a member of the product liability group, focusing her practice on defense of pharmaceutical companies, device manufacturers, and others in litigation.

Jordan L. Tandy and M. Josh Petruniw have joined Wabash firm Tiede Metz & Downs as associates.

Angela L. Gidley has joined Indianapolis and Lebanon law firm Parr Richey Obremskey Frandsen & Patterson as an associate. She will concentrate her practice in utility law and business and employment law.

Rebekah E. Pierson has joined Indianapolis law firm Wooden & McLaughlin as a paralegal in the firm’s real estate and business practice areas.

ELECTIONS & APPOINTMENTS
Anne M. Hamilton, an Indianapolis estate planning attorney with Kroger Gardis & Regas, has been appointed to the board of directors for the Central Indiana affiliate of Susan G. Komen for the Cure.

Trent A. McCain, a litigator with Merrillville firm McCain Law Offices, has been admitted to practice before the Supreme Court of the United States.

AWARDS & HONORS
Michael O. Nelson has been recognized by the National Association of Environmental Professionals. Nelson, an Indianapolis attorney with Hunsucker Goodstein & Nelson, represented the Evansville Greenway & Remediation Trust and General Waste Products in two lawsuits that generated proceeds later used to fund creation of a greenway near downtown Evansville. The NAEP named the newly opened section of greenway, built on a remediated scrap yard owned by GWP, as winner of its 2011 National Environmental Excellence Award in the category of environmental stewardship.

Sharon B. Hearn, a partner with Indianapolis firm Krieg DeVault, was recently presented the national 2011 Membership Recruitment Award for a Professional Member by the ESOP Association.

Andrew Buroker, a partner with Indianapolis firm Krieg DeVault, received the Gold Heart Award from the American Heart Association. This is the AHA’s highest award for volunteers who have supported the association’s mission at the national level.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I like the concept. Seems like a good idea and really inexpensive to manage.

  2. I don't agree that this is an extreme case. There are more of these people than you realize - people that are vindictive and/or with psychological issues have clogged the system with baseless suits that are costly to the defendant and to taxpayers. Restricting repeat offenders from further abusing the system is not akin to restricting their freedon, but to protecting their victims, and the court system, from allowing them unfettered access. From the Supreme Court opinion "he has burdened the opposing party and the courts of this state at every level with massive, confusing, disorganized, defective, repetitive, and often meritless filings."

  3. So, if you cry wolf one too many times courts may "restrict" your ability to pursue legal action? Also, why is document production equated with wealth? Anyone can "produce probably tens of thousands of pages of filings" if they have a public library card. I understand this is an extreme case, but our Supreme Court really got this one wrong.

  4. He called our nation a nation of cowards because we didn't want to talk about race. That was a cheap shot coming from the top cop. The man who decides who gets the federal government indicts. Wow. Not a gentleman if that is the measure. More importantly, this insult delivered as we all understand, to white people-- without him or anybody needing to explain that is precisely what he meant-- but this is an insult to timid white persons who fear the government and don't want to say anything about race for fear of being accused a racist. With all the legal heat that can come down on somebody if they say something which can be construed by a prosecutor like Mr Holder as racist, is it any wonder white people-- that's who he meant obviously-- is there any surprise that white people don't want to talk about race? And as lawyers we have even less freedom lest our remarks be considered violations of the rules. Mr Holder also demonstrated his bias by publically visiting with the family of the young man who was killed by a police offering in the line of duty, which was a very strong indicator of bias agains the offer who is under investigation, and was a failure to lead properly by letting his investigators do their job without him predetermining the proper outcome. He also has potentially biased the jury pool. All in all this worsens race relations by feeding into the perception shared by whites as well as blacks that justice will not be impartial. I will say this much, I do not blame Obama for all of HOlder's missteps. Obama has done a lot of things to stay above the fray and try and be a leader for all Americans. Maybe he should have reigned Holder in some but Obama's got his hands full with other problelms. Oh did I mention HOlder is a bank crony who will probably get a job in a silkstocking law firm working for millions of bucks a year defending bankers whom he didn't have the integrity or courage to hold to account for their acts of fraud on the United States, other financial institutions, and the people. His tenure will be regarded by history as a failure of leadership at one of the most important jobs in our nation. Finally and most importantly besides him insulting the public and letting off the big financial cheats, he has been at the forefront of over-prosecuting the secrecy laws to punish whistleblowers and chill free speech. What has Holder done to vindicate the rights of privacy of the American public against the illegal snooping of the NSA? He could have charged NSA personnel with violations of law for their warrantless wiretapping which has been done millions of times and instead he did not persecute a single soul. That is a defalcation of historical proportions and it signals to the public that the government DOJ under him was not willing to do a damn thing to protect the public against the rapid growth of the illegal surveillance state. Who else could have done this? Nobody. And for that omission Obama deserves the blame too. Here were are sliding into a police state and Eric Holder made it go all the faster.

  5. JOE CLAYPOOL candidate for Superior Court in Harrison County - Indiana This candidate is misleading voters to think he is a Judge by putting Elect Judge Joe Claypool on his campaign literature. paragraphs 2 and 9 below clearly indicate this injustice to voting public to gain employment. What can we do? Indiana Code - Section 35-43-5-3: Deception (a) A person who: (1) being an officer, manager, or other person participating in the direction of a credit institution, knowingly or intentionally receives or permits the receipt of a deposit or other investment, knowing that the institution is insolvent; (2) knowingly or intentionally makes a false or misleading written statement with intent to obtain property, employment, or an educational opportunity; (3) misapplies entrusted property, property of a governmental entity, or property of a credit institution in a manner that the person knows is unlawful or that the person knows involves substantial risk of loss or detriment to either the owner of the property or to a person for whose benefit the property was entrusted; (4) knowingly or intentionally, in the regular course of business, either: (A) uses or possesses for use a false weight or measure or other device for falsely determining or recording the quality or quantity of any commodity; or (B) sells, offers, or displays for sale or delivers less than the represented quality or quantity of any commodity; (5) with intent to defraud another person furnishing electricity, gas, water, telecommunication, or any other utility service, avoids a lawful charge for that service by scheme or device or by tampering with facilities or equipment of the person furnishing the service; (6) with intent to defraud, misrepresents the identity of the person or another person or the identity or quality of property; (7) with intent to defraud an owner of a coin machine, deposits a slug in that machine; (8) with intent to enable the person or another person to deposit a slug in a coin machine, makes, possesses, or disposes of a slug; (9) disseminates to the public an advertisement that the person knows is false, misleading, or deceptive, with intent to promote the purchase or sale of property or the acceptance of employment;

ADVERTISEMENT