ILNews

On the Move - 7/6/11

IL Staff
July 6, 2011
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
On The Move

On The Move: Information must be submitted at least 11 days prior to the Wednesday issue in which the announcement will appear. Digital images should be 200 dpi and saved as eps, tiff or jpeg. Color images are preferred. For more information or to submit an announcement, contact managing editor Kelly Lucas at klucas@ibj.com

New Associations
Diane Gianos has joined Ice Miller as a partner in the firm’s Chicago and DuPage office. She is a member of the firm’s labor and employment practice group.

Jason D. Schultz and Kurt M. Eaton have joined Krieg DeVault as associates in the firm’s Indianapolis office. Schultz is a member of the firm’s health care practice, and Eaton is in the firm’s intellectual property and technology practice, focusing on patent law. Jude Anne Carluccio has joined Krieg DeVault in an of-counsel capacity in the firm’s employee benefits and executive compensation and employee stock ownership plans practice groups. She will establish the firm’s legal presence in Minneapolis, Minn.

J. Eric Davis and J.R. Hensley have joined Indianapolis firm Alerding Castor Hewitt in an of-counsel capacity, serving as advisers to start-up businesses and sports organizations.

Jessica Benson Cox has joined Baker & Daniels as an associate in the firm’s downtown Indianapolis office. She is a member of the product liability group, focusing her practice on defense of pharmaceutical companies, device manufacturers, and others in litigation.

Jordan L. Tandy and M. Josh Petruniw have joined Wabash firm Tiede Metz & Downs as associates.

Angela L. Gidley has joined Indianapolis and Lebanon law firm Parr Richey Obremskey Frandsen & Patterson as an associate. She will concentrate her practice in utility law and business and employment law.

Rebekah E. Pierson has joined Indianapolis law firm Wooden & McLaughlin as a paralegal in the firm’s real estate and business practice areas.

ELECTIONS & APPOINTMENTS
Anne M. Hamilton, an Indianapolis estate planning attorney with Kroger Gardis & Regas, has been appointed to the board of directors for the Central Indiana affiliate of Susan G. Komen for the Cure.

Trent A. McCain, a litigator with Merrillville firm McCain Law Offices, has been admitted to practice before the Supreme Court of the United States.

AWARDS & HONORS
Michael O. Nelson has been recognized by the National Association of Environmental Professionals. Nelson, an Indianapolis attorney with Hunsucker Goodstein & Nelson, represented the Evansville Greenway & Remediation Trust and General Waste Products in two lawsuits that generated proceeds later used to fund creation of a greenway near downtown Evansville. The NAEP named the newly opened section of greenway, built on a remediated scrap yard owned by GWP, as winner of its 2011 National Environmental Excellence Award in the category of environmental stewardship.

Sharon B. Hearn, a partner with Indianapolis firm Krieg DeVault, was recently presented the national 2011 Membership Recruitment Award for a Professional Member by the ESOP Association.

Andrew Buroker, a partner with Indianapolis firm Krieg DeVault, received the Gold Heart Award from the American Heart Association. This is the AHA’s highest award for volunteers who have supported the association’s mission at the national level.•

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. As one of the many consumers affected by this breach, I found my bank data had been lifted and used to buy over $200 of various merchandise in New York. I did a pretty good job of tracing the purchases to stores around a college campus just from the info on my bank statement. Hm. Mr. Hill, I would like my $200 back! It doesn't belong to the state, in my opinion. Give it back to the consumers affected. I had to freeze my credit and take out data protection, order a new debit card and wait until it arrived. I deserve something for my trouble!

  2. Don't we have bigger issues to concern ourselves with?

  3. Anyone who takes the time to study disciplinary and bar admission cases in Indiana ... much of which is, as a matter of course and by intent, off the record, would have a very difficult time drawing lines that did not take into account things which are not supposed to matter, such as affiliations, associations, associates and the like. Justice Hoosier style is a far departure than what issues in most other parts of North America. (More like Central America, in fact.) See, e.g., http://www.theindianalawyer.com/indiana-attorney-illegally-practicing-in-florida-suspended-for-18-months/PARAMS/article/42200 When while the Indiana court system end the cruel practice of killing prophets of due process and those advocating for blind justice?

  4. Wouldn't this call for an investigation of Government corruption? Chief Justice Loretta Rush, wrote that the case warranted the high court’s review because the method the Indiana Court of Appeals used to reach its decision was “a significant departure from the law.” Specifically, David wrote that the appellate panel ruled after reweighing of the evidence, which is NOT permissible at the appellate level. **But yet, they look the other way while an innocent child was taken by a loving mother who did nothing wrong"

  5. Different rules for different folks....

ADVERTISEMENT