Indiana Supreme Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Wells Fargo Insurance v. Bruce A. Land
48A02-0911-CV-1099
Civil. Affirms Land is entitled to commission on all of his 2005 crop-year policies. By Feb. 2, 2006, the date of Land’s
resignation, the sales had been consummated, and his right to the 2005 crop-year commissions had fully accrued, subject only
to receipt of the premium payments. The trial court erred by not deducting the amount Land received as commission from JS
Crop for his 2005 crop-insurance sales and by allowing him to keep $6,000 paid to him in draw in 2006 because it would be
a windfall he’s not entitled to. Land is entitled to attorney fees and appellate attorney fees attributable to his recovery
of unpaid wages. Remands with instructions.
Justin
Davis v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A05-1001-CR-6
Criminal. Affirms convictions of murder, two counts of Class C felony robbery, Class C felony attempted robbery, and Class
A misdemeanor carrying a handgun without a license.
Aaron
D. Ellis v. State of Indiana (NFP)
15A01-1001-CR-56
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A misdemeanor criminal trespass.
Jason
T. Fabini v. Joanne M. Fabini (NFP)
02A03-1003-DR-152
Domestic relation. Affirms order granting Jason Fabini’s motion to modify child support.
Edward
Ray Kind v. State of Indiana (NFP)
79A02-1003-CR-291
Criminal. Affirms sentence following guilty plea to two counts of Class A felony dealing in cocaine, one count of Class A
felony possession of cocaine, and one count of Class D felony maintaining a common nuisance.
Robert
L. Terry v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-0910-CR-993
Criminal. Grants petition for rehearing for the sole purpose of remanding the case to the trial court for clarification on
whether the trial court’s order to suspended Terry’s driving privileges for a fixed period of two years and 90
days was contrary to law.
Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.














The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.