7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United
States of America v. Kimani Lanier Fleming
11-1404
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division, Judge Robert L. Miller Jr.
Criminal. Affirms Fleming’s revised sentence of 480 months imprisonment for convictions of several serious drug and
firearm charges. There was no clear error in the District Court’s decision to include routine drug purchases as relevant
conduct when it computed his revised sentencing guideline range. Denies Fleming’s implicit request for an expanded certificate
of appealability.
Indiana Tax Court
Utilimaster Corporation v. Indiana Dept. of State Revenue
71T10-1008-TA-43
Tax. Rules Utilimaster’s attorneys are not necessary witnesses pursuant to Professional Conduct Rule 3.7, as information
they could testify about can be obtained from Utilimaster employees. The Department of State Revenue has invoked Professional
Conduct Rule 3.7 in an attempt to conceal its failure to timely pursue discovery as well as to remove Utilimaster’s
attorneys from the case, calling their professionalism into question. The court will not countenance the rule’s abuse
as a procedural weapon by invading Utilimaster’s right to counsel of its choice.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Charles
Westmoreland v. State of Indiana
49A04-1107-CR-356
Criminal. Reverses denial of motion to suppress marijuana, finding the trial court erred in denying the motion because the
officers did not reasonably believe Westmoreland was armed and dangerous. Remands with instructions for the trial court to
dismiss the possession of marijuana charge.
Barbara
(Rosario) Bessolo v. William I. Rosario
29A02-1108-DR-789
Domestic relation. Affirms finding that Bessolo failed to dismiss the protective order against Rosario as required by the
dissolution decree, that she was in contempt, and the award of compensatory damages and attorney fees to Rosario. Reverses
the 10-day suspended sentence imposed on Bessolo for future violations of any of the court’s orders. Because Bessolo
was aware that she was required to dismiss the protective order but failed to do so and later relied upon it in her dealing
with police, the trial court did not err in finding her in contempt.
Trust
No. 6011, Lake County Trust Company, Trustee, Simon Beemsterboer, and Victoria J. Beemsterboer v. Heil's Haven Condominiums
Homeowners Assn.
43A05-1108-PL-433
Civil plenary. Reverses the portion of paragraph 1 of the judgment that permanently enjoins the Beemsterboers from obstructing
the homeowners association’s use of the walkway easement and placing a fence that blocks access to that area, paragraph
2 of the judgment ordering the couple to remove the staircase and repair the sidewalk, and paragraph 3 of the judgment prohibiting
the couple from interfering with the reconstructed sidewalk. Affirms paragraph 4 in which the couple was permanently enjoined
“from in any fashion interfering with the (association’s) deck.”
Gerald
Mayberry v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1109-CR-879
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A misdemeanor interference with reporting a crime and Class B misdemeanor battery.
Jamie
E. Green v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A05-1106-CR-316
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class B misdemeanor disorderly conduct.
Robbie S. McCain-Ficklin v. State of Indiana (NFP)
27A02-1108-CR-767
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class D felony battery on McCain-Ficklin’s minor stepson.
Charles Frederick Miller v. State of Indiana (NFP)
41A01-1106-CR-250
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class D felony auto theft.
John
Brooke v. State of Indiana (NFP)
75A05-1106-CR-297
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class B felony conspiracy to commit armed robbery and 22-year sentence.
The
Law Office of Deborah Agard v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development (NFP)
93A02-1107-EX-672
Agency appeal. Affirms finding that the law office owed unemployment insurance tax contributions for an individual the office
paid to perform cleaning services at its office and at Kids’ Voice, a nonprofit center where Deborah Agard, the sole
proprietor of the law office, serves on the board of directors.
Sterling
B. Nelson v. Michelle L. Nelson (NFP)
29A05-1110-DR-533
Domestic relation. Affirms post-dissolution order, in which the trial court imputed $415 in gross weekly income to father
during his 12-week period of unemployment and refused to deviate from the Child Support Guidelines.
Manuel
Martinez v. State of Indiana (NFP)
57A03-1109-CR-554
Criminal. Affirms restitution order following guilty plea to battery.
Michael
M. and Lana S. Ashley, et al. v. Jeffrey and Holly Spaw, et al. (NFP)
02A03-1108-MI-340
Miscellaneous. Affirms trial court’s affirmation of the Indiana Natural Resources Commission’s decision to rule
in favor of several back-lot owners in the Long Lake Park subdivision regarding riparian rights.
Indiana Supreme Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.














The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.