7th Circuit Court of Appeals had posted no Indiana opinions at IL deadline.
Indiana Supreme Court and Indiana Tax Court posted no opinions at IL deadline.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Andre
M. Perry v. State of Indiana (NFP)
45A05-1108-CR-397
Criminal. Affirms convictions of murder, Class A felony attempted murder and Class D felony residential entry.
In
Re the Matter of the Support of David L. Minick, II, David L. Minick v. Victoria S. Cox (NFP)
02A03-1109-DR-419
Domestic relation. Reverses trial court decision which calculated a credit against mother’s child support arrearage
and ordered a credit for a retroactive child support obligation as to father. Remands with instructions.
Donald
E. White v. Susan A. White (NFP)
64A04-1104-DR-230
Domestic relation. Affirms trial court decision to order an unequal division of the marital estate and that disability maintenance
be paid to Susan White. Any error that the trial court may have made in including the value of the stock options in the marital
estate and assigning that value to Donald White was harmless. Remands for further consideration.
Dennis
Fecker, Jr. v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A04-1109-CR-466
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class B felony sexual misconduct with a minor.
Donald
Parker v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1108-CR-788
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A misdemeanor intimidation.
Jakesha
J. Wilms v. State of Indiana (NFP)
02A03-1102-CR-46
Criminal. Affirms guilty plea and the termination of Wilms’ participation in a drug court diversion program.
Carl
Daulton v. State of Indiana (NFP)
88A01-1108-PC-372
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief.
William
D. James v. State of Indiana (NFP)
71A03-1110-CR-486
Criminal. Affirms 30-year sentence for Class A felony child molesting.














Never heard of remand to another state. How often does that happen?
I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.