ILNews

Opinions April 3, 2013

April 3, 2013
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Court of Appeals
Albert Lee Baker v. State of Indiana (NFP)
53A01-1210-CR-490
Criminal. Affirms sentence following guilty plea to Class B felony dealing in a narcotic drug.

John W. Taylor, IV v. State of Indiana (NFP)
20A03-1208-CR-365
Criminal. Affirms convictions of three counts of attempted murder, all as Class A felonies.

Benjamin A. Hankins v. State of Indiana (NFP)
18A02-1207-CR-611
Criminal. Affirms conviction and sentence for murder.

Jason R. Derry, Jr. v. State of Indiana (NFP)
20A03-1208-CR-354
Criminal. Affirms denial of motion to re-sentence following guilty plea to Class D felony possession of cocaine.

Term. of the Parent-Child Rel. of E.B., minor child, and T.S., biological father; T.S. v. Indiana Dept. of Child Services (NFP)
49A05-1208-JT-414
Juvenile. Affirms involuntary termination of parental rights.

Christopher Snyder v. Classic Restaurant Services, LLC (NFP)
29A02-1207-CT-592
Civil tort. Affirms grant of a preliminary injunction against Snyder.

The Indiana Supreme Court and Tax Court posted no opinions by IL deadline. The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals posted no Indiana decisions by IL deadline.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Family court judges never fail to surprise me with their irrational thinking. First of all any man who abuses his wife is not fit to be a parent. A man who can't control his anger should not be allowed around his child unsupervised period. Just because he's never been convicted of abusing his child doesn't mean he won't and maybe he hasn't but a man that has such poor judgement and control is not fit to parent without oversight - only a moron would think otherwise. Secondly, why should the mother have to pay? He's the one who made the poor decisions to abuse and he should be the one to pay the price - monetarily and otherwise. Yes it's sad that the little girl may be deprived of her father, but really what kind of father is he - the one that abuses her mother the one that can't even step up and do what's necessary on his own instead the abused mother is to pay for him???? What is this Judge thinking? Another example of how this world rewards bad behavior and punishes those who do right. Way to go Judge - NOT.

  2. Right on. Legalize it. We can take billions away from the drug cartels and help reduce violence in central America and more unwanted illegal immigration all in one fell swoop. cut taxes on the savings from needless incarcerations. On and stop eroding our fourth amendment freedom or whatever's left of it.

  3. "...a switch from crop production to hog production "does not constitute a significant change."??? REALLY?!?! Any judge that cannot see a significant difference between a plant and an animal needs to find another line of work.

  4. Why do so many lawyers get away with lying in court, Jamie Yoak?

  5. Future generations will be amazed that we prosecuted people for possessing a harmless plant. The New York Times came out in favor of legalization in Saturday's edition of the newspaper.

ADVERTISEMENT