ILNews

Opinions Aug. 21, 2012

August 21, 2012
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

7th Circuit Court of Appeals posted no Indiana opinions at IL deadline.

Indiana Supreme Court and Tax Court posted no opinions at IL deadline.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Jason Fields v. State of Indiana
47A04-1110-CR-577
Criminal. Affirms two convictions of Class B felony dealing in methamphetamine. The trial court’s response to the jury’s mid-deliberation question did not constitute a modification of the jury instructions.

Gary Watts v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1201-CR-24
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class D felony theft.

Michael Cochran v. State of Indiana (NFP)
04A03-1201-PC-20
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief.

Freddie Boggess v. State of Indiana (NFP)
75A03-1112-CR-581
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class B felony dealing in methamphetamine, Class D felony possession of chemical reagents or precursors with intent to manufacture, Class A misdemeanor driving while suspended, and Class B misdemeanor false informing.

Brandon E. Klein v. K.J. (NFP)
79A02-1112-PO-1157
Protective order. Affirms protective order issued against Klein.

Mark Williams v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A04-1201-CR-4
Criminal. Affirms order Williams serve entire sentence that was suspended at the time of initial sentencing.

Leonard Dewitt v. State of Indiana (NFP)
15A01-1202-PC-63
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief.

Cody Hunt v. State of Indiana (NFP)
35A05-1112-CR-677
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class D felony battery of a child less than 14 years of age by someone older than 18.

Gregory Vories v. State of Indiana (NFP)
42A04-1201-CR-32
Criminal. Dismisses Vories’ appeal of the denial of his motion for modification of bond.

Reginald Lee v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1112-CR-1127
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class B felony robbery and Class D felony auto theft.

Michael Timothy Dean v. State of Indiana (NFP)
73A01-1112-CR-624
Criminal. Affirms conviction of attempted obstruction of justice as a Class D felony.

Christopher Davis v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A04-1201-CR-19
Criminal. Affirms revocation of probation and execution of previously suspended sentence.

Bruce William Lee v. State of Indiana (NFP)
02A04-1204-CR-173
Criminal. Affirms sentence for Class D felony failure to register as a sex or violent offender.

John Norton, Jr. v. State of Indiana (NFP)
5A04-1202-CR-99
Criminal. Affirms sentence for Class B felony burglary.

Giorgio E. White v. State of Indiana (NFP)
02A03-1201-CR-51
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class C felony carrying a handgun without a license.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. He did not have an "unlicensed handgun" in his pocket. Firearms are not licensed in Indiana. He apparently possessed a handgun without a license to carry, but it's not the handgun that is licensed (or registered).

  2. Once again, Indiana's legislature proves how friendly it is to monopolies. This latest bill by Hershman demonstrates the lengths Indiana's representatives are willing to go to put big business's (especially utilities') interests above those of everyday working people. Maassal argues that if the technology (solar) is so good, it will be able to compete on its own. Too bad he doesn't feel the same way about the industries he represents. Instead, he wants to cut the small credit consumers get for using solar in order to "add a 'level of certainty'" to his industry. I haven't heard of or seen such a blatant money-grab by an industry since the days when our federal, state, and local governments were run by the railroad. Senator Hershman's constituents should remember this bill the next time he runs for office, and they should penalize him accordingly.

  3. From his recent appearance on WRTV to this story here, Frank is everywhere. Couldn't happen to a nicer guy, although he should stop using Eric Schnauffer for his 7th Circuit briefs. They're not THAT hard.

  4. They learn our language prior to coming here. My grandparents who came over on the boat, had to learn English and become familiarize with Americas customs and culture. They are in our land now, speak ENGLISH!!

  5. @ Rebecca D Fell, I am very sorry for your loss. I think it gives the family solace and a bit of closure to go to a road side memorial. Those that oppose them probably did not experience the loss of a child or a loved one.

ADVERTISEMENT