ILNews

Opinions Aug. 21, 2012

August 21, 2012
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

7th Circuit Court of Appeals posted no Indiana opinions at IL deadline.

Indiana Supreme Court and Tax Court posted no opinions at IL deadline.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Jason Fields v. State of Indiana
47A04-1110-CR-577
Criminal. Affirms two convictions of Class B felony dealing in methamphetamine. The trial court’s response to the jury’s mid-deliberation question did not constitute a modification of the jury instructions.

Gary Watts v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1201-CR-24
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class D felony theft.

Michael Cochran v. State of Indiana (NFP)
04A03-1201-PC-20
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief.

Freddie Boggess v. State of Indiana (NFP)
75A03-1112-CR-581
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class B felony dealing in methamphetamine, Class D felony possession of chemical reagents or precursors with intent to manufacture, Class A misdemeanor driving while suspended, and Class B misdemeanor false informing.

Brandon E. Klein v. K.J. (NFP)
79A02-1112-PO-1157
Protective order. Affirms protective order issued against Klein.

Mark Williams v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A04-1201-CR-4
Criminal. Affirms order Williams serve entire sentence that was suspended at the time of initial sentencing.

Leonard Dewitt v. State of Indiana (NFP)
15A01-1202-PC-63
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief.

Cody Hunt v. State of Indiana (NFP)
35A05-1112-CR-677
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class D felony battery of a child less than 14 years of age by someone older than 18.

Gregory Vories v. State of Indiana (NFP)
42A04-1201-CR-32
Criminal. Dismisses Vories’ appeal of the denial of his motion for modification of bond.

Reginald Lee v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1112-CR-1127
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class B felony robbery and Class D felony auto theft.

Michael Timothy Dean v. State of Indiana (NFP)
73A01-1112-CR-624
Criminal. Affirms conviction of attempted obstruction of justice as a Class D felony.

Christopher Davis v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A04-1201-CR-19
Criminal. Affirms revocation of probation and execution of previously suspended sentence.

Bruce William Lee v. State of Indiana (NFP)
02A04-1204-CR-173
Criminal. Affirms sentence for Class D felony failure to register as a sex or violent offender.

John Norton, Jr. v. State of Indiana (NFP)
5A04-1202-CR-99
Criminal. Affirms sentence for Class B felony burglary.

Giorgio E. White v. State of Indiana (NFP)
02A03-1201-CR-51
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class C felony carrying a handgun without a license.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. The ADA acts as a tax upon all for the benefit of a few. And, most importantly, the many have no individual say in whether they pay the tax. Those with handicaps suffered in military service should get a pass, but those who are handicapped by accident or birth do NOT deserve that pass. The drivel about "equal access" is spurious because the handicapped HAVE equal access, they just can't effectively use it. That is their problem, not society's. The burden to remediate should be that of those who seek the benefit of some social, constructional, or dimensional change, NOT society generally. Everybody wants to socialize the costs and concentrate the benefits of government intrusion so that they benefit and largely avoid the costs. This simply maintains the constant push to the slop trough, and explains, in part, why the nation is 20 trillion dollars in the hole.

  2. Hey 2 psychs is never enough, since it is statistically unlikely that three will ever agree on anything! New study admits this pseudo science is about as scientifically valid as astrology ... done by via fortune cookie ....John Ioannidis, professor of health research and policy at Stanford University, said the study was impressive and that its results had been eagerly awaited by the scientific community. “Sadly, the picture it paints - a 64% failure rate even among papers published in the best journals in the field - is not very nice about the current status of psychological science in general, and for fields like social psychology it is just devastating,” he said. http://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/aug/27/study-delivers-bleak-verdict-on-validity-of-psychology-experiment-results

  3. Indianapolis Bar Association President John Trimble and I are on the same page, but it is a very large page with plenty of room for others to join us. As my final Res Gestae article will express in more detail in a few days, the Great Recession hastened a fundamental and permanent sea change for the global legal service profession. Every state bar is facing the same existential questions that thrust the medical profession into national healthcare reform debates. The bench, bar, and law schools must comprehensively reconsider how we define the practice of law and what it means to access justice. If the three principals of the legal service profession do not recast the vision of their roles and responsibilities soon, the marketplace will dictate those roles and responsibilities without regard for the public interests that the legal profession professes to serve.

  4. I have met some highly placed bureaucrats who vehemently disagree, Mr. Smith. This is not your father's time in America. Some ideas are just too politically incorrect too allow spoken, says those who watch over us for the good of their concept of order.

  5. Lets talk about this without forgetting that Lawyers, too, have FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND ASSOCIATION

ADVERTISEMENT