ILNews

Opinions Aug. 29, 2012

August 29, 2012
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

7th Circuit Court of Appeals posted no Indiana opinions at IL deadline.

Indiana Supreme Court and Tax Court posted no opinions at IL deadline.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Willis Pryor v. State of Indiana
49A02-1202-CR-101
Criminal. Reverses conviction of Class A misdemeanor resisting law enforcement. Pryor’s trial counsel’s failure to preserve his right to a jury trial denied Pryor effective assistance of counsel. Remands with instructions to vacate the conviction and hold a new trial by jury.

Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Bill Gaddis Chrysler Dodge, Inc., Garrett Gaddis and Edward Foster
18A02-1112-PL-1087
Civil plenary. Affirms denial of Auto-Owner’s motion for summary judgment in the declaratory judgment action. The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Auto-Owners’ motion to strike Foster’s response as untimely. The trial court should have stricken four late-filed affidavits, but the insurer didn’t show it was prejudiced by the denial of its motion to strike.

Margaret R. Smith and Darrell G. Smith v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, as Trustee Under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, Dated as of June 1, 2003, et al. (NFP)
89A01-0702-CV-94
Civil. Affirms summary judgment in a foreclosure action brought by JPMorgan Chase Bank.

Edward LeFlore v. State of Indiana (NFP)
73A01-1111-CR-551
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class A felony burglary, Class B felonies robbery and criminal confinement, Class C felony intimidation with a deadly weapon, Class D felony fleeing law enforcement, Class A misdemeanor carrying a handgun without a license, and adjudication as a habitual offender.

Robert Brandon v. State of Indiana (NFP)
20A05-1202-CR-53
Criminal. Affirms Class A felony robbery conviction and aggregate 60-year sentence. Orders burglary conviction be reduced from a Class A felony to a Class B felony and resentenced.

Term. of Parent-Child Rel. of J.K., M.K., and C.K. (Minor Children); and S.P. (Mother) v. Indiana Dept. of Child Services and Lake County CASA (NFP)
45A03-1201-JT-45
Juvenile termination of parental rights. Affirms involuntary termination of parental rights.

Jerry L. Ward, Jr. v. State of Indiana (NFP)
09A04-1201-CR-54
Criminal. Affirms denial of motion to withdraw guilty plea and affirms Ward’s sentence.

William N. Gerard v. Althea L. Gerard (NFP)
90A04-1112-DR-642
Domestic relation. Affirms award of attorney and expert witness fees to Althea Gerard in the action involving modification of William Gerard’s parenting time.

Timothy Tingle v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1110-CR-976
Criminal. Affirms admittance of evidence related to a duffle bag and its contents during a bench trial for various drug charges.

Jean D. Schoknecht v. Susan E. Dunlap f/k/a Hasemeier and f/k/a Scribner (NFP)
49A02-1201-CP-37
Civil plenary. Affirms dismissal of landlord Schoknecht’s complaint against tenant Dunlap pursuant to Indiana Trial Rule 41(E).

Eugene Strader v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1201-CR-57
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A misdemeanor possession of marijuana.

Bradley J. Vossberg, and Diana Jachimiak v. Glen A. Gray, Kimberly L. Gray, and Kevin Hardie, d/b/a The Hardie Group (NFP)
34A04-1110-PL-546
Civil plenary. Affirms award of damages to the Grays but reverses with regard to the award of damages to Hardie.

In the Matter of A.J.J.: J.J. v. S.H. (NFP)
71A03-1112-JP-568
Juvenile paternity. Affirms dismissal of motion to terminate support.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  2. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  3. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  4. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

  5. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

ADVERTISEMENT