ILNews

Opinions Aug. 4, 2014

August 4, 2014
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Bruce Carneil Webster v. John F. Caraway, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Terre Haute
14-1049
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Terre Haute Division. Judge William T. Lawrence.
Civil. Affirms dismissal of Webster’s petition for collateral relief under 28 U.S.C. Section 2241. Agrees with District Court’s decision that the petition is blocked by Section 2255(e), under which Webster had previously sought collateral relief in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, the circuit where he had committed his crime.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Domingo Gonzalez v. State of Indiana (NFP)
12A04-1312-CR-643
Criminal.  Affirms convictions of Class D felony criminal confinement and Class B misdemeanor unauthorized entry of a motor vehicle.

Tiffany Thompson, Jason Thompson, and Cassie Thompson v. Fields Gutter & Siding, Inc., Pamela Sue Fields, and Michael C. Ford, Jr. (NFP)
32A05-1403-CT-131
Civil tort. Affirms summary judgment in favor of Fields Gutter & Siding Inc., Fields and Ford on the Thompsons’ lawsuit alleging FGS was liable for Ford’s negligent acts under the theory of respondeat superior and the company breached its common law duty to use reasonable care.

Eric P. Mains v. Citibank, NA as Trustee for WAMU Series 2007-HE2 Trust (NFP)
10A04-1309-MF-450
Mortgage foreclosure. Affirms summary judgment against Mains in a mortgage foreclosure action brought against him and Anna V. Mains by Citibank.

Antoinette Crosslin v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development and Kenya Hamilton (NFP)
93A02-1305-EX-413
Agency action. Affirms determination Crosslin is ineligible for unemployment benefits.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT