ILNews

Opinions Aug. 9, 2010

August 9, 2010
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association Inc., et al. v. Mayflower Transit, LLC
08-1673
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge Sarah Evans Barker.
Civil. Affirms judgment with respect to a chargeback for the cost of insurance not being a sale of insurance. Rules the period of limitations for suits under Section 14704(a)(2) is four years, not two. Remands for further proceedings that may be required by the ruling on the limitations issue.

Indiana Supreme Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.

Indiana Court of Appeals
L.T. v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1001-JV-62
Juvenile. Affirms adjudication that L.T. committed Class A misdemeanor battery if committed by an adult.

Devin Steele v. State of Indiana (NFP)
15A01-1003-CR-126
Criminal. Affirms sentence following guilty plea to Class D felonies domestic battery with a child present, domestic battery with a prior conviction, and possession of a controlled substance. Affirms sentence imposed following the revocation of Steele’s probation.

Steven L. Fortner v. Janet M. Fortner (NFP)
67A05-1001-DR-36
Domestic relation. Affirms orders regarding the contempt petitions and attorney fees. Affirms dissolution of marriage, but remands for consideration of omitted marital debts. Affirms physical custody order but remands for clarification of legal custody of G.F. Reverses child support order and remands for clarification.

Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.

The Indiana Supreme Court denied transfer to 20 cases for the week ending Aug. 6.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Can I get this form on line,if not where can I obtain one. I am eligible.

  2. What a fine example of the best of the Hoosier tradition! How sad that the AP has to include partisan snark in the obit for this great American patriot and adventurer.

  3. Why are all these lawyers yakking to the media about pending matters? Trial by media? What the devil happened to not making extrajudicial statements? The system is falling apart.

  4. It is a sad story indeed as this couple has been only in survival mode, NOT found guilty with Ponzi, shaken down for 5 years and pursued by prosecution that has been ignited by a civil suit with very deep pockets wrenched in their bitterness...It has been said that many of us are breaking an average of 300 federal laws a day without even knowing it. Structuring laws, & civilForfeiture laws are among the scariest that need to be restructured or repealed . These laws were initially created for drug Lords and laundering money and now reach over that line. Here you have a couple that took out their own money, not drug money, not laundering. Yes...Many upset that they lost money...but how much did they make before it all fell apart? No one ask that question? A civil suit against Williams was awarded because he has no more money to fight...they pushed for a break in order...they took all his belongings...even underwear, shoes and clothes? who does that? What allows that? Maybe if you had the picture of him purchasing a jacket at the Goodwill just to go to court the next day...his enemy may be satisfied? But not likely...bitterness is a master. For happy ending lovers, you will be happy to know they have a faith that has changed their world and a solid love that many of us can only dream about. They will spend their time in federal jail for taking their money from their account, but at the end of the day they have loyal friends, a true love and a hope of a new life in time...and none of that can be bought or taken That is the real story.

  5. Could be his email did something especially heinous, really over the top like questioning Ind S.Ct. officials or accusing JLAP of being the political correctness police.

ADVERTISEMENT