Opinions August 26, 2013

IL Staff
August 26, 2013
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Opinions – Aug. 26, 2013

Indiana Court of Appeals

Stephanie Murry v. State of Indiana (NFP)
Criminal. Affirms revocation of placement in Marion County Community Corrections.

Lysa Wefler v. Mark Wefler (NFP)
Domestic relations. Affirms holding of contempt of court against Lysa Welfer for violation of the settlement agreement in her dissolution of marriage.

Mir Iqbal, Et Al. v. S-Mart Petroleum, Inc. (NFP)
Mortgage forceclosure. Affirms trial court order in favor of S-Mart.

Term. of the Parent-Child Rel. of D.C., Minor Child, and K.C., Mother: K.C. v. Indiana Dept. of Child Services and Lake County Court Appointed Special Advocate (NFP)
Juvenile. Affirms termination of mother K.C.’s parental rights.

Kevin R. Harris v. State of Indiana (NFP)
Criminal. Affirms conviction and sentence for Class D felony criminal recklessness.

T.B. v. State of Indiana (NFP)

Juvenile. Affirms in part, reverses in part and remands adjudication of delinquency for two counts of what would have been Class B felony robbery if committed by an adult. Trial court is ordered to vacate one of the true findings of robbery as it violates the continuing crime doctrine.

Andrew D. Fisher v. State of Indiana (NFP)

Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A felony attempted murder.

Derrick King v. State of Indiana (NFP)

Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class B misdemeanor disorderly conduct.

Anthony Robert Konsoer v. State of Indiana (NFP)
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A felony dealing in methamphetamine.

Indiana Supreme Court and Indiana Tax Court issued no opinions by IL deadline Monday.

U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals issued no Indiana opinions by IL deadline Monday.



Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Heritage, what Heritage? The New Age is dawning .... an experiment in disordered liberty and social fragmentation is upon us .... "Carmel City Council approved a human rights ordinance with a 4-3 vote Monday night after hearing about two hours of divided public testimony. The ordinance bans discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity, among other traits. Council members Rick Sharp, Carol Schleif, Sue Finkam and Ron Carter voted in favor of it. The three council members opposing it—Luci Snyder, Kevin Rider and Eric Seidensticker—all said they were against any form of discrimination, but had issues with the wording and possible unintended consequences of the proposal." Kardashian is the new Black.

  2. Can anyone please tell me if anyone is appealing the law that certain sex offenders can't be on school property. How is somebody supposed to watch their children's sports games or graduations, this law needs revised such as sex offenders that are on school property must have another non-offender adult with them at all times while on school property. That they must go to the event and then leave directly afterwards. This is only going to hurt the children of the offenders and the father/ son mother/ daughter vice versa relationship. Please email me and let me know if there is a group that is appealing this for reasons other than voting and religion. Thank you.

  3. Should any attorney who argues against the abortion industry, or presents arguments based upon the Founders' concept of Higher Law, (like that marriage precedes the State) have to check in with the Judges and Lawyers Assistance Program for a mandatory mental health review? Some think so ... that could certainly cut down on cases such as this "cluttering up" the SCOTUS docket ... use JLAP to deny all uber conservative attorneys licenses and uber conservative representation will tank. If the ends justify the means, why not?

  4. Tell them sherry Mckay told you to call, they're trying to get all the people that have been wronged and held unlawfully to sign up on this class action lawsuit.

  5. Call Young and Young aAttorneys at Law theres ones handling a class action lawsuit