ILNews

Opinions August 26, 2013

IL Staff
August 26, 2013
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Opinions – Aug. 26, 2013

Indiana Court of Appeals

Stephanie Murry v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1301-CR-39
Criminal. Affirms revocation of placement in Marion County Community Corrections.

Lysa Wefler v. Mark Wefler (NFP)
45A03-1206-DR-268
Domestic relations. Affirms holding of contempt of court against Lysa Welfer for violation of the settlement agreement in her dissolution of marriage.

Mir Iqbal, Et Al. v. S-Mart Petroleum, Inc. (NFP)
79A02-1210-MF-860
Mortgage forceclosure. Affirms trial court order in favor of S-Mart.

Term. of the Parent-Child Rel. of D.C., Minor Child, and K.C., Mother: K.C. v. Indiana Dept. of Child Services and Lake County Court Appointed Special Advocate (NFP)
45A03-1301-JT-22
Juvenile. Affirms termination of mother K.C.’s parental rights.

Kevin R. Harris v. State of Indiana (NFP)
02A03-1210-CR-445
Criminal. Affirms conviction and sentence for Class D felony criminal recklessness.

T.B. v. State of Indiana (NFP)

49A02-1301-JV-113
Juvenile. Affirms in part, reverses in part and remands adjudication of delinquency for two counts of what would have been Class B felony robbery if committed by an adult. Trial court is ordered to vacate one of the true findings of robbery as it violates the continuing crime doctrine.

Andrew D. Fisher v. State of Indiana (NFP)

38A04-1301-CR-41
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A felony attempted murder.

Derrick King v. State of Indiana (NFP)

49A05-1211-CR-579
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class B misdemeanor disorderly conduct.

Anthony Robert Konsoer v. State of Indiana (NFP)
82A05-1301-CR-30
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A felony dealing in methamphetamine.

Indiana Supreme Court and Indiana Tax Court issued no opinions by IL deadline Monday.

U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals issued no Indiana opinions by IL deadline Monday.






 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. What is this, the Ind Supreme Court thinking that there is a separation of powers and limited enumerated powers as delegated by a dusty old document? Such eighteen century thinking, so rare and unwanted by the elites in this modern age. Dictate to us, dictate over us, the massess are chanting! George Soros agrees. Time to change with times Ind Supreme Court, says all President Snows. Rule by executive decree is the new black.

  2. I made the same argument before a commission of the Indiana Supreme Court and then to the fedeal district and federal appellate courts. Fell flat. So very glad to read that some judges still beleive that evidentiary foundations matter.

  3. KUDOS to the Indiana Supreme Court for realizing that some bureacracies need to go to the stake. Recall what RWR said: "No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we'll ever see on this earth!" NOW ... what next to this rare and inspiring chopping block? Well, the Commission on Gender and Race (but not religion!?!) is way overdue. And some other Board's could be cut with a positive for State and the reputation of the Indiana judiciary.

  4. During a visit where an informant with police wears audio and video, does the video necessary have to show hand to hand transaction of money and narcotics?

  5. I will agree with that as soon as law schools stop lying to prospective students about salaries and employment opportunities in the legal profession. There is no defense to the fraudulent numbers first year salaries they post to mislead people into going to law school.

ADVERTISEMENT