7th Circuit Court of Appeals had posted no Indiana opinions at IL deadline.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Douglas Garwood v. State of Indiana (NFP)
35A02-1106-CR-588
Criminal. Affirms conviction of and sentence for Class B felony dealing in methamphetamine and reverses conviction of Class
D felony possession of precursors with intent to manufacture methamphetamine.
Term. of Parent-Child Rel. of A.B.; K.S. v. The Indiana Dept. of Child Services, and Child Advocates,
Inc. (NFP)
49A04-1105-JT-255
Juvenile. Affirms termination of parental rights.
Lorenzo Stewart v. State of Indiana (NFP)
02A03-1104-PC-179
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief.
Natosha Canfield, Individually, and Next Best Friend of D.C., Minor v. Clarian Health Partners,
Inc. d/b/a Methodist Hospital (NFP)
49A02-1104-CT-292
Civil tort. Affirms grant of Clarian’s motion to strike and motions for summary judgment and partial summary judgment
on Canfield’s suit claiming negligence and negligent infliction of emotional distress.
James Groff v. State of Indiana (NFP)
http://media.ibj.com/Lawyer/websites/opinions/index.php?pdf=2011/december/12121106ehf.pdf
90A02-1106-CR-610
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A misdemeanor invasion of privacy.
Steven E. Abernathy v. State of Indiana (NFP)
23A01-1104-CR-182
Criminal. Affirms conditions of probation imposed following Abernathy’s guilty plea to Class D felony resisting law
enforcement and Class A misdemeanor driving while suspended.
The Indiana Supreme Court and Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.














The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.