ILNews

Opinions Dec. 12, 2011

December 12, 2011
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

7th Circuit Court of Appeals had posted no Indiana opinions at IL deadline.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Douglas Garwood v. State of Indiana (NFP)
35A02-1106-CR-588
Criminal. Affirms conviction of and sentence for Class B felony dealing in methamphetamine and reverses conviction of Class D felony possession of precursors with intent to manufacture methamphetamine.

Term. of Parent-Child Rel. of A.B.; K.S. v. The Indiana Dept. of Child Services, and Child Advocates, Inc. (NFP)
49A04-1105-JT-255
Juvenile. Affirms termination of parental rights.

Lorenzo Stewart v. State of Indiana (NFP)

02A03-1104-PC-179
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief.

Natosha Canfield, Individually, and Next Best Friend of D.C., Minor v. Clarian Health Partners, Inc. d/b/a Methodist Hospital (NFP)
49A02-1104-CT-292
Civil tort. Affirms grant of Clarian’s motion to strike and motions for summary judgment and partial summary judgment on Canfield’s suit claiming negligence and negligent infliction of emotional distress.

James Groff v. State of Indiana (NFP)
http://media.ibj.com/Lawyer/websites/opinions/index.php?pdf=2011/december/12121106ehf.pdf   
90A02-1106-CR-610
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A misdemeanor invasion of privacy.

Steven E. Abernathy v. State of Indiana (NFP)
23A01-1104-CR-182
Criminal. Affirms conditions of probation imposed following Abernathy’s guilty plea to Class D felony resisting law enforcement and Class A misdemeanor driving while suspended.

The Indiana Supreme Court and Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Hail to our Constitutional Law Expert in the Executive Office! “What you’re not paying attention to is the fact that I just took an action to change the law,” Obama said.

  2. What is this, the Ind Supreme Court thinking that there is a separation of powers and limited enumerated powers as delegated by a dusty old document? Such eighteen century thinking, so rare and unwanted by the elites in this modern age. Dictate to us, dictate over us, the massess are chanting! George Soros agrees. Time to change with times Ind Supreme Court, says all President Snows. Rule by executive decree is the new black.

  3. I made the same argument before a commission of the Indiana Supreme Court and then to the fedeal district and federal appellate courts. Fell flat. So very glad to read that some judges still beleive that evidentiary foundations matter.

  4. KUDOS to the Indiana Supreme Court for realizing that some bureacracies need to go to the stake. Recall what RWR said: "No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we'll ever see on this earth!" NOW ... what next to this rare and inspiring chopping block? Well, the Commission on Gender and Race (but not religion!?!) is way overdue. And some other Board's could be cut with a positive for State and the reputation of the Indiana judiciary.

  5. During a visit where an informant with police wears audio and video, does the video necessary have to show hand to hand transaction of money and narcotics?

ADVERTISEMENT