ILNews

Opinions Dec. 16, 2011

December 16, 2011
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

7th Circuit Court of Appeals had issued no Indiana opinions at IL deadline.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Justin M. Corwin v. State of Indiana
79A04-1005-CR-296
Criminal. Reverses conviction of Class C felony possession of a controlled substance, holding that a police officer exceeded the limits of a search as defined by Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 30 (1968), and therefore, the evidence he obtained in the search should not have been admitted at trial.

Will Arline v. State of Indiana (NFP)
48A04-1103-CR-133
Criminal. Affirms conviction of three counts of Class C felony forgery.

Robert Morelock v. State of Indiana (NFP)
29A02-1108-CR-736
Criminal. Affirms sentence for Class D felony invasion of privacy.

Arthur Dedrick Green v. State of Indiana (NFP)
45A05-1105-CR-230
Criminal. Affirms sentence for Class A felony voluntary manslaughter.

Frederick Allen v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1101-CR-2
Criminal. Affirms conviction of murder.

Mark Koers v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A04-1105-CR-243
Criminal. Affirms trial court’s denial of motion to suppress evidence.

Diana L. Gipson v. Craig G. Gipson (NFP)
79A05-1103-DR-138
Domestic relation. Remands to the trial court to recalculate spousal maintenance award, holding the court did not account for the disparity in earnings potential.

Harvey Byrd v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1106-CR-478
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class B felony robbery, Class B felony criminal confinement and Class C felony carrying a handgun without a license.

Chris Fields v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A04-1105-CR-223
Criminal. Reverses conviction of Class B felony unlawful possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon.

Mario J. Gaston v. State of Indiana (NFP)
84A01-1105-CR-198
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class B felony aggravated battery.

Jeryl R. Bingham v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A05-1107-PC-409
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief.

Indiana Supreme Court and Indiana Tax Court had issued no opinions at IL deadline.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by
2015 Distinguished Barrister &
Up and Coming Lawyer Reception

Tuesday, May 5, 2015 • 4:30 - 7:00 pm
Learn More


ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Uh oh, someone is really going to get their panti ... uh, um ... I mean get upset now: http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/mar/31/arkansas-passes-indiana-style-religious-freedom-bill

  2. Bryan, stop insulting the Swedes by comparing them to the American oligarchs. Otherwise your point is well taken.

  3. Sociologist of religion Peter Berger once said that the US is a “nation of Indians ruled by Swedes.” He meant an irreligious elite ruling a religious people, as that Sweden is the world’s least religious country and India the most religious. The idea is that American social elites tend to be much less religious than just about everyone else in the country. If this is true, it helps explain the controversy raking Indiana over Hollywood, San Fran, NYC, academia and downtown Indy hot coals. Nevermind logic, nevermind it is just the 1993 fed bill did, forget the Founders, abandon of historic dedication to religious liberty. The Swedes rule. You cannot argue with elitists. They have the power, they will use the power, sit down and shut up or feel the power. I know firsthand, having been dealt blows from the elite's high and mighty hands often as a mere religious plebe.

  4. I need helping gaining custody of my 5 and 1 year old from my alcoholic girlfriend. This should be an easy case for any lawyer to win... I've just never had the courage to take her that far. She has a record of public intox and other things. She has no job and no where to live othe than with me. But after 5 years of trying to help her with her bad habit, she has put our kids in danger by driving after drinking with them... She got detained yesterday and the police chief released my kids to me from the police station. I live paycheck to paycheck and Im under alot of stress dealing with this situation. Can anyone please help?

  5. The more a state tries to force people to associate, who don't like each other and simply want to lead separate lives, the more that state invalidates itself....... This conflict has shown clearly that the advocates of "tolerance" are themselves intolerant, the advocates of "diversity" intend to inflict themselves on an unwilling majority by force if necessary, until that people complies and relents and allows itself to be made homogenous with the politically correct preferences of the diversity-lobbies. Let's clearly understand, this is force versus force and democracy has nothing to do with this. Democracy is a false god in the first place, even if it is a valid ideal for politics, but it is becoming ever more just an empty slogan that just suckers a bunch of cattle into paying their taxes and volunteering for stupid wars.

ADVERTISEMENT