7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United
States of America v. Juan A. Corona-Gonzalez a/k/a Juan R. Ramirez
09-3993
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge David F. Hamilton.
Criminal. Reverses sentence for drug convictions and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime.
There is a substantial chance that the District Court’s misapprehension of whether Corona-Gonzalez was deported and
returned to the country illegally played a significant role in the adjudication of his sentence. Remands to allow the District
Court to reassess the sentence free of the factual misapprehension.
Indiana Supreme Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Paul J. Kocielko v. State of Indiana
20A03-1002-CR-218
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class B felony sexual misconduct with a minor and habitual offender adjudication. Remands
with instructions to set aside Class C felony conviction of and sentence for sexual misconduct with a minor because Kocielko
committed acts against a single victim in one confrontation, so double jeopardy prohibitions prevented his being convicted
of and sentenced for the Class C felony charge. Affirms in all other respects.
Kenneth Pope and Judie Pope v. Hancock County Rural Electric d/b/a Central Indiana Power
30A05-1001-CT-3
Civil tort. Affirms order granting Central Indiana Power’s motion for judgment on the evidence in the Popes’
suit alleging the company was negligent because its failure to timely restore power to their home caused Kenneth to injure
himself in the dark. The Popes didn’t establish that a standard of care existed by which CIP should have worked to restore
power to its customers after the storm and that there was a breach of that standard of care. CIP’s actions were not
the proximate cause of Kenneth’s injuries.
James and Robert New v. Personal Representative of the Estate of Martha New
71A04-0912-CV-744
Civil. Affirms denial of Robert’s combined motion to correct error, motion for relief from judgment, and motion for
reconsideration of the court’s approval of the estate of Martha New’s third amended final accounting. The probate
court didn’t err when it approved the estate’s third amended accounting without affording time for notice and
a hearing. Remands for a determination of appellate attorney fees for the estate.
Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.














vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.