7th Circuit Court of Appeals had posted no Indiana opinions by IL deadline.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Linzy C. Clark v. State of Indiana
48A04-1104-CR-249
Criminal. Reverses trial court’s denial of Clark’s motion to dismiss the notice of probation violation. After
the probation was transferred from Madison County to Tippecanoe County, the Tippecanoe County court held supervisory authority.
It received notice of the probation violation, but Madison County – the sentencing court – did not, nor did it
file the notice of probation violation within 45 days of receiving the notice of violation.
Jason Jones v. State of Indiana
34A05-1101-CR-66
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class B felony dealing in methamphetamine and Class B misdemeanor visiting a common nuisance.
Holds that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting testimony and photographs in lieu of certain physical
evidence that had been destroyed by law enforcement officers in accordance with Indiana Code 35-5-5-5. Further, the trial
court did not err by allowing a law enforcement officer to testify as a skilled witness regarding the one-pot reaction method
of manufacturing methamphetamine.
Gold C. Washington v. State of Indiana (NFP)
79A02-1105-CR-407
Criminal. Reverses sentences for two convictions of Class D felony battery on a child, holding the court abused its discretion
by imposing a sentence greater than allowed by statute. Remands for resentencing.
Aaron Michael Rohr v. State of Indiana (NFP)
40A01-1102-CR-55
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class A felony neglect of a dependent resulting in death, Class B felony aggravated battery
and Class B felony battery of a child by an adult causing serious bodily injury.
Indiana Supreme Court and Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions by IL deadline.
Indiana Supreme Court granted transfer in two cases for the week ending Dec. 2.














Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.
In regards to bill's comment about trusting the cover meant. We can trust them about as much as we can trust attorneys'.
This is disturbing to learn...
Yikes!