Indiana Court of Appeals
Connie Yates, Rick Yates, Jason Tibbs, and Pauline Tibbs v. Levi Wayne Kemp
50A04-1204-CT-192
Civil tort. Reverses grant of partial summary judgment to Kemp on the Yateses’ and Tibbses’ claims for nuisance.
Based on the plain language of I.C. 14-22-31.5-6 and its context in the act as a whole, Kemp is not shielded by section 6
from liability related to his neighbors’ nuisance claims arising from noise pollution. There is also a material fact
as to whether Kemp has caused his neighbors to experience inconvenience, annoyance or discomfort.
Thomson, Inc., n/k/a Technicolor USA, Inc., Technicolor, Inc., and Technicolor Limited v. Continental
Casualty Co.; Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. & Travelers Property Casualty Co. of Am., et al.
49A05-1201-PL-24
Civil plenary. Affirms summary judgment in favor of Continental as to whether its umbrella policy issued to Technicolor covers
losses resulting from administrative agencies. Under California law, damages under the umbrella policy are limited to those
as a result of courtroom litigation rather than administrative proceedings.
In Re: The Adoption of K.H.: S.H. (Mother) v. W.B. and B.B. (Guardians) (NFP)
59A01-1205-AD-212
Adoption. Affirms denial of motion to correct error, which challenged the adoption of K.H.
Toni Cox v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1205-CR-367
Criminal. Affirms conviction of disorderly conduct.
Hugh Z. Nelson v. Renee Burtin (NFP)
45A03-1111-DR-576
Domestic relation. Dismisses appeal of the disposition of the marital assets.
Andra Dossey v. State of Indiana (NFP)
27A04-1204-CR-175
Criminal. Affirms order Dossey serve his entire previously suspended sentence after his probation was revoked.
Steven Kamp v. State of Indiana (NFP)
66A05-1109-PC-485
Post conviction. Grants rehearing to clarify certain factual assertions made in the original opinion and reaffirms in all
respects.
on Facebook & Twitter
Back to Top
I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.