7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United
States of America v. Derrick L. Bullock
10-2238
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Fort Wayne Division, Judge Theresa L. Springmann.
Criminal. Bullock pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute at least five grams but less than fifty grams of cocaine
base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). His plea was conditioned on his ability to appeal the District Court’s
denial of his motion to suppress evidence of the crack that led to his conviction. Affirms District Court ruling there was
reasonable suspicion to detain Bullock during the search, probable cause existed to arrest Bullock for visiting a common nuisance
under Indiana law after police found marijuana in plain view and other evidence of recurrent and widespread drug activity
within the residence. His detention was lawful under principles set forth in Terry v. Ohio, and the subsequent arrest
was supported by probable cause.
Indiana Supreme Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Walsh & Kelly, Inc. v. International Contractors, Inc., et al.
64A03-1006-PL-284
Civil plenary. Affirms judgment in favor of Signature Properties Inc. with respect to Signature’s claim that it was
not fully indemnified for its damages by a collateral assignment agreement and with respect to Signature’s claim that
Walsh & Kelly slandered the title of Signature’s property. The agreement does not fully indemnify Signature such
that Signature has not suffered a pecuniary loss. By filing an action to foreclose the lien instead of releasing the lien
after it received notice that it was not legally entitled to file the lien, Walsh acted with reckless disregard for the truth.
L.C. v. R.C. (NFP)
23A05-1002-DR-200
Domestic relation. Affirms dissolution order distributing the parties’ property, awarding primary physical custody
of the children to mother R.C., and granting R.C.’s motion to relocate.
Charles Pennington v. State of Indiana (NFP)
15A01-1007-CR-345
Criminal. Affirms sentence following guilty pleas to Class B misdemeanor public intoxication, Class D felony operating a
vehicle while intoxicated with a prior conviction, Class D felony possession of a controlled substance, and Class D felony
possession of a legend drug in three separate causes.
Joshua Hooten v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1006-CR-684
Criminal. Affirms revocation of probation.
David Harrold v. Robert Thornburg, Personal Rep. of the Estate of Roland Walker (NFP)
68A05-0911-CV-671
Civil. Affirms judgment in favor of Robert Thornburg, as the personal representative of the estate of Roland J. Walker in
the estate’s action against Harrold as a result of Harrold’s transfer of real estate to himself while acting as
attorney-in-fact for the decedent, Roland J. Walker .
Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.














I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.