7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United
States of America v. Roger D. Slone
09-4089
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division, Judge Rudy Lozano.
Criminal. Affirms conviction of conspiracy to distribute marijuana and sentence of 120 months in prison. The search incident
to his arrest was reasonable and the vehicle evidence was properly admitted against him.
United States of America v. James Guyton
09-3866
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division, Judge Rudy Lozano.
Criminal. Affirms denial of Guyton’s motion for a sentence reduction. He was sentenced for a crack-cocaine offense
before the U.S. Supreme Court held that the sentencing guidelines were advisory, and his applicable guideline range was established
on the basis of his career-offender status before he received a substantial assistance departure. Thus, Amendment 706, which
left the career-offender guideline unchanged, did not affect his applicable guideline range and he didn’t qualify for
a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. Section 3582(c)(2).
Indiana Supreme Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Allstate Insurance Company v. Gary R. Love
32A01-1005-CT-239
Civil tort. Affirms the trial court properly denied Allstate’s request to set aside default judgment entered in favor
of Love. Love’s counsel did not commit misconduct when he failed to notify Dietrick before seeking default judgment
against Allstate because he didn’t know Dietrick represented Allstate on this claim. The trial court’s award of
$255,000 to Love was interlocutory and therefore Allstate may still appear and be heard as to the amount of damages resulting
from the judgment. Remands for a hearing on the damages award.
Craig Dennis v. Board of Public Safety of Fort Wayne, Indiana
02A03-1007-PL-379
Civil plenary. Reverses order of dismissal of Fort Wayne police officer Dennis’ complaint for judicial review after
the Board of Public Safety denied his request for back pay. His indefinite unpaid leave pending the outcome of the criminal
charge was a suspension of greater than five days, thus subject to judicial review. The board’s decision became final
when it denied Dennis’ request for back pay, such that his complaint for judicial review was timely filed. Remands for
further proceedings.
James C. Taylor v. State of Indiana
02A03-1003-CR-194
Criminal. Affirms convictions of and sentence for Class A felony burglary; Class B felony criminal deviate conduct; Class
B felony attempted rape; jury verdict he is guilty but mentally ill of a second charge of criminal deviate conduct and of
Class D felony sexual battery; and jury determination that he is a habitual offender. The trial court did not abuse its discretion
in refusing to give the tendered instruction on residential entry. The state established a foundation for the admission of
a letter Taylor wrote to an Allen County judge pursuant to Indiana Rule of Evidence 901 and the court did not abuse its discretion
by admitting it.
Keith Hoglund v. State of Indiana
90A02-1005-CR-591
Criminal. Affirms conviction of and sentence for Class A felony child molesting. The trial court did not abuse its discretion
in admitting testimony that indirectly vouched for A.H.’s credibility and he was properly sentenced. Judge Darden concurs
in result.
State of Indiana v. Andy J. Velasquez, II
53A05-1003-CR-194
Criminal. Affirms there was no abuse of discretion in the giving of a preliminary instruction pursuant to Evidence Rules
105 and 404(b). The trial court erred in excluding the testimony of witnesses under Evidence Rules 802 and 704(b). Double
jeopardy principles bar a second trial as Velasquez was acquitted of Class A felony child molesting and Class C felony child
molesting.
Paul J. Kocielko v. State of Indiana
20A03-1002-CR-218
Criminal. Grants rehearing and affirms the decision of the trial court in all respects, except the 30-year habitual offender
enhancement imposed upon the Class C felony conviction of sexual misconduct with a minor. Instructs the trial court to vacate
this enhancement because Kocielko’s Class B felony sentence was so enhanced.
Jamie Escobedo v. State of Indiana (NFP)
71A04-1004-CR-300
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A misdemeanor criminal trespass.
Robert D. Neal, Jr. v. State of Indiana (NFP)
60A05-1009-CR-596
Criminal. Affirms sentence following guilty plea to Class D felony receiving stolen property and Class A misdemeanor resisting
law enforcement.
Naugle Gibson v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A05-1007-CR-404
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A misdemeanor domestic battery.
Term. of Parent-Child Rel. of L.S.; A.S. v. IDCS (NFP)
02A03-1007-JT-385
Juvenile. Affirms termination of parent-child relationship.
Gregory Preyer v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A05-1007-CR-397
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A misdemeanor criminal trespass.
Larry Burdette (deceased) v. Perlman-Rocque Company (NFP)
93A02-1007-EX-770
Civil. Affirms denial of application for adjustment of claim.
Elizabeth S. Mathias v. State of Indiana (NFP)
35A02-1009-CR-1079
Criminal. Affirms revocation of probation.
Leo Machine & Tool, Inc., et al. v. Gary M. Gerardot (NFP)
02A03-1006-PL-365
Civil plenary. Affirms summary judgment that Geradot had no notice of a defect in the electrical wiring of the premises he
owned, and thus did not owe Leo Machine and other appellants a duty to maintain and repair the premises’ electrical
system. Affirms denial of the appellants’ motions for sanctions for spoliation of evidence against Geradot.
Anthony McCoy v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1007-CR-746
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class B felony robbery, Class A misdemeanor criminal recklessness and Class A misdemeanor
intimidation.
In the Matter of T.R., Alleged to be CHINS; S.S. & R.R. v. IDCS (NFP)
52A05-1008-JC-544
Juvenile. Affirms determination T.R. is a child in need of services. Remands with instructions for the court to issue an
amended dispositional order which includes written reasons and findings for the disposition based upon the evidence presented
at the fact-finding and dispositional hearings in accordance with Indiana Code Section 31-34-19-10.
Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.














I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.