7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Northeastern
Rural Electric Membership Corp. v. Wabash Valley Power Association
12-2037
Vacates preliminary injunction granted by the U.S. District Court of the Southern District of Indiana, and remands the case
to the district court so it may remand it to state court. Found the federal court does not have jurisdiction because the key
questions of whether the contract was valid and whether the contract was breached are not questions of federal law.
Indiana Supreme Court
K.W. v. State of Indiana
49S02-1301-JV-20
Juvenile. Affirms Court of Appeals reversal of trial court ruling designating K.W. a delinquent for resisting law enforcement,
and orders the delinquency adjudication vacated. Justices held that evidence was insufficient that K.W. acted “forcibly”
to resist a school resource officer when he pulled away as the officer was attempting to handcuff him.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Clematine Hollingsworth v. State of Indiana
49A02-1207-CR-617
Criminal. Affirms conviction for Class B misdemeanor public intoxication, holding that an amendment to the statute could
not be retroactively applied.
Nathan Carl Gilbert v. State of Indiana
10A05-1204-CR-220
Criminal. Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remands for resentencing of a Kentucky inmate on four counts of burglary,
holding he was denied due process at his sentencing hearing when he wasn’t allowed sufficient time to prepare or properly
examine his pre-sentence investigation report. The court held that the “anti-shuffling” provision of the Interstate
Agreement on Detainers was not violated when Gilbert was returned to Kentucky before his sentencing hearing could be held
in Indiana because the proceeding did not constitute a trial as defined under that provision.
Joshua King v. State of Indiana
49A02-1204-CR-351
Criminal. Affirms King’s convictions for Class C felony battery, Class A misdemeanor battery, and Class D felony strangulation
and remands for correction of the Abstract of Judgment which incorrectly lists King’s second battery conviction as a
Class C felony. Ruled the court did not violate King’s rights under the Confrontation Clause when it admitted testimony
given by a police officer based on statements from the victim. Also found the trial court did not abuse its discretion when
it admitted recordings of calls of King discussing the crime from jail.
John Kennendy v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1206-CR-450
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class D felony theft.
Shawn W. Nicosin v. William J. Mesaeh and Loretta D. Mesaeh (NFP)
11A01-1207-MI-308
Miscellaneous/grandparent visitation. Reverses and remands the trial court’s grant of visitation of G.N. with her maternal
grandparents, holding that the court erred by deviating from the requirements established in In re Guardianship of A.L.C.,
902 N.E.2d 343, 356 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009).
Kelvin Hampton v. State of Indiana (NFP)
84A04-1209-CR-483
Criminal. Reverses and remands a denial of request for return of $146 in $1 bills and a photograph seized during a search
of his residence, holding there was no indication the state instigated civil forfeiture proceedings.
Kevin Smith v. State of Indiana (NFP)
45A04-1205-PC-264
Post conviction. Affirms denial of post-conviction relief on convictions of Class A felony rape and criminal deviate conduct,
Class B felony criminal confinement and Class C felony sexual battery.
Pablo C. Gallo v. Sandra Moira Hyland (NFP)
79A02-1207-DR-624
Domestic relations. Reverses and remands the trial court’s distribution of marital property order with instructions
that the court follow the statutory presumption of equal distribution of property or set forth its rationale for deviating
from it.
The Indiana Tax Court issued no opinions prior to IL deadline.














Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.
In regards to bill's comment about trusting the cover meant. We can trust them about as much as we can trust attorneys'.
This is disturbing to learn...
Yikes!