The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, Indiana Supreme Court and Indiana Tax Court had no opinions at IL deadline.
Indiana Court of Appeals
CFS, LLC and Charles Blackwelder v. Bank of America, Successor in Interest to LaSalle Bank Midwest National
Association
29A02-1105-MF-436
Mortgage foreclosure. Affirms trial court’s granting of summary judgment in favor of Bank of America, finding
that the bank established no genuine issue of material fact existed about whether a successor bank surviving after a merger
could enforce the note and mortgage of the predecessor.
Undray D. Wilson v. State of Indiana (NFP)
34A02-1012-PC-1389
Post-conviction. Affirms denial of post-conviction relief in murder case on grounds that trial and appellate counsel were
not ineffective.
Sasha Slater v. Ridinger Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Shakamak IGA (NFP)
28A05-1104-CT-207
Civil tort. Reverses and remands slip-and-fall injury case where a store had obtained summary judgment on grounds that the
plaintiff didn’t provide evidence as to what caused her fall. Finds the plaintiff created a genuine issue of material
fact about the floor where the injury occurred and ruled the trial court’s summary judgment ruling was an error.
In Re: Levi Jacob Loucks Testimonial Trust and James M. Loucks, Trustee; Angel M. Lepley v. Levi J.
Loucks (NFP)
17A04-1107-TR-386
Trust. Affirms judgment of trial court that denied a woman’s request to access principal trust funds to pay child support
and also denied her request for attorney fees incurred while trying to collect the child support.
Jeremy D. Stone v. State of Indiana (NFP)
02A04-1007-CR-464
Criminal. Affirms a three-year executed sentence for strangulation, finding that defendant-appellant didn’t demonstrate
the trial court abused its discretion in failing to mention the man’s guilty plea as a mitigating factor. Nothing is
inappropriate about the sentence based on the offender’s character and nature of the crime.
Danny W. Ramsey v. State of Indiana (NFP)
14A01-1102-PC-84
Post-conviction. Affirms trial court’s partial denial of a post-conviction relief petition regarding an evidentiary
hearing request, whether trial counsel provided ineffective assistance, and whether appellate counsel’s failure to challenge
the sentence constituted ineffective assistance.
Antoine L. Skinner v. State of Indiana (NFP)
48A02-1105-CR-514
Criminal. Affirms a probation revocation, finding that the trial court didn’t abuse its discretion in revoking all
four years of a suspended sentence because of the man’s single sale of cocaine to a police informant which the defendant-appellant
claimed was “a trivial violation.”
T.W.O. f/k/a T.L.W. v. G.A.W. (NFP)
64A03-1106-DR-289
Domestic relations. Affirms trial court’s decision in favor of the father on grounds that the trial court didn’t
abuse its discretion in denying mother’s request to modify custody, didn’t abuse its discretion in dividing marital
property, and didn’t abuse its discretion in declining to modify the mother’s child support obligation to an earlier
date.
Zachery Lewis v. State of Indiana (NFP)
35A02-1108-CR-796
Criminal. Affirms one-year jail sentence for two counts of Class A misdemeanor battery resulting in bodily injury, finding
that the nature of the offense and offender’s character didn’t make the sentence inappropriate.
Henry A. Booker v. State of Indiana (NFP)
03A01-1105-CR-221
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A felony dealing in a Schedule II controlled substance, finding the 40-year sentence
is appropriate, that the evidence was sufficient and the trial court didn’t abuse its discretion in jury instruction
regarding the defendant’s defense to the crime.














vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.