ILNews

Opinions Feb. 3, 2014

February 3, 2014
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Court of Appeals
William Rinehart v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A05-1305-CR-236
Criminal. Reverses conviction of Class C felony possession of a handgun without a license.

Jessie L. Johnston v. State of Indiana (NFP)
02A05-1308-CR-395
Criminal. Affirms convictions of two counts of Class A felony child molesting, one count of Class C felony child molesting, and two counts of Class A misdemeanor contributing to the delinquency of a minor.

Joshua S. F. Nelson v. State of Indiana (NFP)
73A01-1304-CR-178
Criminal. Affirms sentence following guilty plea to Class A felony dealing in cocaine, Class B felony dealing in a narcotic drug, and Class A misdemeanor resisting law enforcement.

Sandra M. Pasquale v. Thomas M. Pasquale (NFP)
09A04-1304-DR-169
Domestic relation. Affirms post-dissolution order that restricted Sandra Pasquale’s parenting time.

Eugene Selvidge and Ann Selvidge v. Second Harvest Food Bank of East Central Indiana, Inc. and Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina (NFP)
18A02-1307-CT-627
Civil tort. Affirms summary judgment in favor of Selective Insurance Co. of South Carolina and the finding that there was no underinsured motorist or medical payment coverage available to the Selvidges.

The Indiana Supreme Court and Tax Court posted no opinions by IL deadline. The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals posted no Indiana opinions by IL deadline.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Well, maybe it's because they are unelected, and, they have a tendency to strike down laws by elected officials from all over the country. When you have been taught that "Democracy" is something almost sacred, then, you will have a tendency to frown on such imperious conduct. Lawyers get acculturated in law school into thinking that this is the very essence of high minded government, but to people who are more heavily than King George ever did, they may not like it. Thanks for the information.

  2. I pd for a bankruptcy years ago with Mr Stiles and just this week received a garnishment from my pay! He never filed it even though he told me he would! Don't let this guy practice law ever again!!!

  3. Excellent initiative on the part of the AG. Thankfully someone takes action against predators taking advantage of people who have already been through the wringer. Well done!

  4. Conour will never turn these funds over to his defrauded clients. He tearfully told the court, and his daughters dutifully pledged in interviews, that his first priority is to repay every dime of the money he stole from his clients. Judge Young bought it, much to the chagrin of Conour’s victims. Why would Conour need the $2,262 anyway? Taxpayers are now supporting him, paying for his housing, utilities, food, healthcare, and clothing. If Conour puts the money anywhere but in the restitution fund, he’s proved, once again, what a con artist he continues to be and that he has never had any intention of repaying his clients. Judge Young will be proven wrong... again; Conour has no remorse and the Judge is one of the many conned.

  5. Pass Legislation to require guilty defendants to pay for the costs of lab work, etc as part of court costs...

ADVERTISEMENT