ILNews

Opinions Feb. 3, 2014

February 3, 2014
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Court of Appeals
William Rinehart v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A05-1305-CR-236
Criminal. Reverses conviction of Class C felony possession of a handgun without a license.

Jessie L. Johnston v. State of Indiana (NFP)
02A05-1308-CR-395
Criminal. Affirms convictions of two counts of Class A felony child molesting, one count of Class C felony child molesting, and two counts of Class A misdemeanor contributing to the delinquency of a minor.

Joshua S. F. Nelson v. State of Indiana (NFP)
73A01-1304-CR-178
Criminal. Affirms sentence following guilty plea to Class A felony dealing in cocaine, Class B felony dealing in a narcotic drug, and Class A misdemeanor resisting law enforcement.

Sandra M. Pasquale v. Thomas M. Pasquale (NFP)
09A04-1304-DR-169
Domestic relation. Affirms post-dissolution order that restricted Sandra Pasquale’s parenting time.

Eugene Selvidge and Ann Selvidge v. Second Harvest Food Bank of East Central Indiana, Inc. and Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina (NFP)
18A02-1307-CT-627
Civil tort. Affirms summary judgment in favor of Selective Insurance Co. of South Carolina and the finding that there was no underinsured motorist or medical payment coverage available to the Selvidges.

The Indiana Supreme Court and Tax Court posted no opinions by IL deadline. The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals posted no Indiana opinions by IL deadline.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Don't we have bigger issues to concern ourselves with?

  2. Anyone who takes the time to study disciplinary and bar admission cases in Indiana ... much of which is, as a matter of course and by intent, off the record, would have a very difficult time drawing lines that did not take into account things which are not supposed to matter, such as affiliations, associations, associates and the like. Justice Hoosier style is a far departure than what issues in most other parts of North America. (More like Central America, in fact.) See, e.g., http://www.theindianalawyer.com/indiana-attorney-illegally-practicing-in-florida-suspended-for-18-months/PARAMS/article/42200 When while the Indiana court system end the cruel practice of killing prophets of due process and those advocating for blind justice?

  3. Wouldn't this call for an investigation of Government corruption? Chief Justice Loretta Rush, wrote that the case warranted the high court’s review because the method the Indiana Court of Appeals used to reach its decision was “a significant departure from the law.” Specifically, David wrote that the appellate panel ruled after reweighing of the evidence, which is NOT permissible at the appellate level. **But yet, they look the other way while an innocent child was taken by a loving mother who did nothing wrong"

  4. Different rules for different folks....

  5. I would strongly suggest anyone seeking mediation check the experience of the mediator. There are retired judges who decide to become mediators. Their training and experience is in making rulings which is not the point of mediation.

ADVERTISEMENT