ILNews

Opinions Feb. 3, 2014

February 3, 2014
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Court of Appeals
William Rinehart v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A05-1305-CR-236
Criminal. Reverses conviction of Class C felony possession of a handgun without a license.

Jessie L. Johnston v. State of Indiana (NFP)
02A05-1308-CR-395
Criminal. Affirms convictions of two counts of Class A felony child molesting, one count of Class C felony child molesting, and two counts of Class A misdemeanor contributing to the delinquency of a minor.

Joshua S. F. Nelson v. State of Indiana (NFP)
73A01-1304-CR-178
Criminal. Affirms sentence following guilty plea to Class A felony dealing in cocaine, Class B felony dealing in a narcotic drug, and Class A misdemeanor resisting law enforcement.

Sandra M. Pasquale v. Thomas M. Pasquale (NFP)
09A04-1304-DR-169
Domestic relation. Affirms post-dissolution order that restricted Sandra Pasquale’s parenting time.

Eugene Selvidge and Ann Selvidge v. Second Harvest Food Bank of East Central Indiana, Inc. and Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina (NFP)
18A02-1307-CT-627
Civil tort. Affirms summary judgment in favor of Selective Insurance Co. of South Carolina and the finding that there was no underinsured motorist or medical payment coverage available to the Selvidges.

The Indiana Supreme Court and Tax Court posted no opinions by IL deadline. The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals posted no Indiana opinions by IL deadline.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT