7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Jurijus
Kadamovas v. Michael Stevens, et al.
12-2669
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Terre Haute Division, Judge William T. Lawrence.
Civil. Reverses dismissal of prisoner Kadamovas’ lawsuit against prison officials and other inmates for unintelligibility.
The suit is actually written clearly and not 99 pages as the judge believed, but just 28 pages. Remands for further consideration.
United
States of America v. Adolfo Wren and Anthony Moton
12-1565, 12-1580
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division, Judge Rudy Lozano, Judge James T. Moody.
Criminal. Vacates denial of Wren’s and Moton’s request for a sentence reduction for previous crack offenses and
remands to the District Court so the judges may exercise the discretion they possess.
United
States of America v. Ronald Love
11-2547
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division, Judge Joseph S. Van Bokkelen.
Criminal. Affirms Love’s convictions of distributing crack cocaine and conspiring to distribute crack cocaine. Vacates
his sentence and remands for resentencing under the Fair Sentencing Act. Finds evidence was enough to support the jury verdict
and to support a two-level sentencing enhancement for being an organizer, leader, manager or supervisor of the conspiracy.
Bernard
Hawkins v. United States of America
11-1245
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division, Judge James T. Moody.
Civil. Affirms judgment denying the Section 2255 motion authorizing post-conviction alteration of a sentence filed by Hawkins.
An erroneous computation of an advisory guidelines sentence is reversible (unless harmless) on direct appeal; it doesn’t
follow that it’s reversible years later in a post-conviction proceeding. Judge Rovner dissents.
Indiana Court of Appeals
State of Indiana v. William Coats
49A02-1206-CR-526
Criminal. Affirms denial of state’s motion to commit Coats to the Indiana Division of Mental Health and Addiction.
It is clear that Coats’ dementia will progress and there is simply no hope or medical reason to believe that competency
will be restored. Judge Riley dissents.
Christina M. Kovats v. State of Indiana
15A01-1205-CR-224
Criminal. Orders the trial court to vacate Kovats’ convictions for Class D felony criminal recklessness and Class D
felony OWI and enter a judgment of conviction and concurrent sentence on the lesser-included offense of Class A misdemeanor
OWI because those convictions were based on or elevated by the same serious bodily injury. Orders her sentence revised to
15 years on the Class B felony conviction of neglect of a dependent.
Terry Smith v. State of Indiana
49A05-1202-CR-88
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class B felony robbery, Class B felony possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon,
Class D felony auto theft, and Class D felony resisting law enforcement. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting
the state’s motion to continue so that the state could procure the testimony of a necessary witness. The trial court
also did not abuse its discretion in the admission of the evidence regarding the shots fired and casings found, the evidence
obtained during the execution of the search warrant, or the DNA evidence obtained from the buccal swab. Lastly, the state
presented evidence sufficient to support the trial court’s determination that Smith was a habitual offender.
Christopher Estridge v. State of Indiana (NFP)
15A01-1205-CR-209
Criminal. Affirms revocation of probation.
Kenneth L. Robinson v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1206-CR-514
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class C felony possession of cocaine.
Charles Day v. State of Indiana (NFP)
79A04-1206-CR-303
Criminal. Affirms convictions of three counts of Class A felony child molesting and two counts as Class C felonies, Class
A felony attempted child molesting and Class D felony child solicitation; and affirms sentence of 44 years in the Department
of Correction.
Kenny L. Futch v. State of Indiana (NFP)
02A03-1209-CR-381
Criminal. Affirms two convictions of Class B felony dealing in cocaine and two concurrent 17-year sentences with two years
suspended to probation on each count.
James Kerner v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A05-1205-CR-271
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A misdemeanor trespass.
Jamie Masterson v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1206-CR-485
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class D felony identity deception.
In Re: The Adoption of T.W.: T.J. v. J.B. (NFP)
02A05-1108-AD-451
Adoption. Affirms that consent of father T.J. is not required for adoption of T.W.
Prince Harris v. State of Indiana (NFP)
45A03-1205-CR-232
Criminal. Affirms convictions of murder and robbery.
Larry R. Dean, Jr. v. State of Indiana (NFP)
27A04-1204-PC-174
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief.
Anthony Paul Banks v. State of Indiana (NFP)
50A05-1207-CR-343
Criminal. Affirms revocation of probation and order Banks serve his entire previously suspended sentence in the Department
of Correction.
In Re: The Paternity of B.H.: S.H. v. B.B. (NFP)
54A01-1208-JP-340
Juvenile. Affirms order modifying father S.H.’s child support obligation based on a determination hearing that the
child is incapacitated.
Neff Family Fertilizer, Inc. v. John Jones Chevrolet Buick Cadillac of Salem, Inc. (NFP)
88A05-1207-PL-381
Civil plenary. Affirms entry of summary judgment in favor of John Jones dealership on Neff Family Fertilizer’s suit
for damages after Neff canceled its order for a new truck.
Gregory D. Sutton v. State of Indiana (NFP)
01A02-1210-CR-876
Criminal. Affirms sentence for Class C felony nonsupport of a dependent child.
The Indiana Supreme Court and Tax Court posted no opinions at IL deadline.














Never heard of remand to another state. How often does that happen?
I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.