Indiana Court of Appeals
Billy Russell v. State of Indiana
49A04-1203-CR-148
Criminal. Affirms conviction and sentence on charges of murder and Class B felony possession of a firearm by a serious violent
felon. The panel found that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to completely bifurcate the trial of
the SVF charge from the murder charge or in refusing to tender Russell’s self-defense jury instruction. The court also
determined the 85-year sentence was not inappropriate.
Hiawathia Hunt v. State of Indiana
49A04-1207-CR-371
Criminal. Affirms 545-day sentence, 270 executed, on a conviction of Class D felony theft following a bench trial, holding
that a sentence in which the judge offered possible leniency in time served in exchange for restitution to the victim was
not error because the sentence was not conditioned upon restitution but rather offered possible modification if restitution
was paid.
Estate of Ruby L. Rowland: James A. Rowland, Jr. v. Michael B. Rowland (NFP)
48A02-1203-ES-223
Estate, supervised. Affirms the trial court’s denial of the Estate’s petition to recover assets. Ruled the trial
court properly found that the presumption of undue influence does not apply and properly found the Estate failed to prove
that the statutory presumption for survivorship rights was overcome.
Louis Townsend v. State of Indiana (NFP)
48A04-1207-PC-389
Post conviction. Affirms trial court’s denial of Townsend’s petition for relief. Found the post-conviction court
did not err when it concluded that Townsend did not receive ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel and when
it concluded Townsend was not entitled to post-conviction relief on the basis of newly-discovered evidence.
The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals issued no Indiana decisions prior to IL deadline. The Indiana Supreme Court
and Tax Court issued no opinions prior to IL deadline.














Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.
In regards to bill's comment about trusting the cover meant. We can trust them about as much as we can trust attorneys'.
This is disturbing to learn...
Yikes!