7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Sammie L. Booker-El v. Superintendent, Indiana State Prison and all agents
10-1490
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division, Judge Robert L. Miller Jr.
Civil. Affirms District Court’s dismissal of Booker-El’s complaint that prison officials misappropriated funds
intended by statute to be used for the inmates’ benefit without due process of law. Booker-El has no property interest
in the inmates’ recreation fund.
Indiana Supreme Court and Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Angus Toney v. State of Indiana
89A01-1108-CR-374
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A felony burglary. The plain language of the statute provides that physical pain is
sufficient to establish bodily injury, and the evidence clearly shows that the victim experienced physical pain.
Terry Drake v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1106-CR-516
Criminal. Affirms convictions of murder, Class A felony attempted murder, and Class A misdemeanor carrying a handgun without
a license.
Shannan D. Deneve v. Billy Joe Shambarger (NFP)
43A03-1107-DR-354
Domestic relation. Affirms order denying Deneve’s request to order Shambarger to participate in counseling with their
minor child and to order Shambarger to strictly comply with the parenting time guidelines. Also affirms award of attorney
fees to Shambarger.














Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.
Forcing a defendant to wear a stun belt, in court or otherwise, is a violation of american principles! It is also unconstitutional!
So, if I save $100.00 cash per week, from my $500.00 per week paycheck, for 50 years, at which time, I will have saved $260,000.00, the government can raid my home and take my money, just by saying it is drug money! Shouldn't the government, have some kind of evidence of drugs, rather, than just saying we are the government and we will take anything you own, anytime we choose? Tyranny is upon us! If you don't know your rights, you don't have any!