7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Amorita
N. Thomas, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. H&R Block Eastern Enterprises Inc.
10-1482
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge David Hamilton.
Affirms summary judgment in favor of H&R Block in Thomas’ suit under Indiana’s Wage Payment Statute for paying
its end-of-season compensation more than 10 days after it was earned. Concludes that the end-of-season compensation is not
a wage under the statute because it was depending on other factors than her efforts and it would be highly difficult for the
company to calculate it within 10 days. Declines to send a certified question on the issue to the Indiana Supreme Court.
Indiana Supreme Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Beck's Superior Hybrids, Inc. v. Monsanto Company, et al.
29A05-1008-MI-489
Miscellaneous. Reverses order that Beck’s comply with the arbitration panel’s subpoena. Section 7 of the Federal
Arbitration Act preempts Indiana Trial Rule 28(E) and Monsanto’s lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction to enforce
its subpoena doesn’t justify ignoring the plain text of Section 7. Remands with instructions that the court dismiss
Monsanto’s petition to assist. Judge Baker dissents.
Brian Reese v. State of Indiana
64A03-1001-CR-18
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class A felony attempted murder, Class A misdemeanor resisting law enforcement, and carrying
a handgun without a license, elevated to a Class C felony due to a prior offense. The trial court did not abuse its discretion
by admitting evidence of uncharged bad acts, there is sufficient evidence to support his conviction of attempted murder, and
he was properly sentenced. The use of “attack” in jury instruction Final Instruction 26 is at most a harmless
error in light of the testimony that Reese deliberately fired multiple shots at the police officer.
Alesa Pack v. Indiana Family and Social Services Administration
89A05-1004-PL-240
Civil plenary. Grants rehearing for the sole purpose of clarifying the correct application of Administrative Orders and Procedures
Act to Medicaid determinations regarding recipients and applications. Clarifies that while the AOPA applies to judicial review
of Medicaid determinations, separate rules apply to the review of such decisions by an administrative law judge as they pertain
to recipients of and applications for Medicaid benefits. Affirms original decision in all respects. Judge Riley voted to deny
petition for rehearing without opinion.
Glenn L. Carpenter v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1005-CR-521
Criminal. Affirms conviction of unlawful possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon as a Class B felony, adjudication
as a habitual offender, and sentence imposed.
Lucas T. Scholl v. State of Indiana (NFP)
07A01-1004-CR-166
Criminal. Affirms conviction of operating a vehicle while intoxicated, endangering a person as a Class A misdemeanor.
Camiell Chest v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1005-CR-544
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class D felony domestic battery.
Wesley D. Willis v. State of Indiana (NFP)
71A04-1005-CR-304
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class A felony voluntary manslaughter, Class A felony attempted murder, and two counts of
Class C felony criminal recklessness.
Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.














I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.