ILNews

Opinions Jan. 20, 2011

January 20, 2011
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Supreme Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Nathaniel Williams v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1005-CR-466
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class B felony dealing in a narcotic drug and Class A felony dealing in a narcotic drug.

Daniel Buchanan v. State of Indiana (NFP)
07A04-1003-CR-181
Criminal. Affirms convictions of three counts of Class B felony armed robbery, and one count each of Class B felony criminal confinement and Class B felony burglary.

Deborah Walton, et al. v. Claybridge Homeowners Association, Inc. (NFP)
29A05-1006-MF-399
Mortgage foreclosure. Affirms summary judgment order granting foreclosure of a judgment lien on Walton’s residence in favor of Claybridge Homeowners Association.

Christopher M. Lee v. State of Indiana (NFP)
24A01-1006-CR-282
Criminal. Affirms aggregate sentence of 20-and-a-half years with 16 years executed and four-and-a-half years suspended to probation.

Anthony Bedolla v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1003-CR-368
Criminal. Affirms murder conviction.

Austin Zell v. State of Indiana (NFP)
48A05-1006-CR-371
Criminal. Affirms revocation of probation and order Zell serve three years in the Department of Correction.

Gregory Fording v. State of Indiana (NFP)
09A02-1006-CR-604
Criminal. Affirms sentence following guilty plea to Class B felony dealing in methamphetamine.

Brian Biddle v. State of Indiana (NFP)
15A01-1005-CR-262
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A misdemeanor resisting law enforcement and the revocation of probation.

Michael Stiles v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1005-CR-590
Criminal. Reverses sentence following guilty plea to Class D felony operating a vehicle while intoxicated and to being a habitual offender. Remands with instructions to correct the sentencing order.

Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I need an experienced attorney to handle a breach of contract matter. Kindly respond for more details. Graham Young

  2. I thought the slurs were the least grave aspects of her misconduct, since they had nothing to do with her being on the bench. Why then do I suspect they were the focus? I find this a troubling trend. At least she was allowed to keep her law license.

  3. Section 6 of Article I of the Indiana Constitution is pretty clear and unequivocal: "Section 6. No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religious or theological institution."

  4. Video pen? Nice work, "JW"! Let this be a lesson and a caution to all disgruntled ex-spouses (or soon-to-be ex-spouses) . . . you may think that altercation is going to get you some satisfaction . . . it will not.

  5. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

ADVERTISEMENT