ILNews

Opinions Jan. 22, 2014

January 22, 2014
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Court of Appeals
Antoine Duff v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1306-CR-503
Criminal. Affirms 16-year sentence, with 10 years executed and six years suspended, for Class B felony battery.

Anthony Barnett v. State of Indiana (NFP)
22A01-1302-PC-84
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief.

Zachary Buza v. State of Indiana (NFP)
61A05-1304-CR-149
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class A felony attempted murder, Class B felony attempted aggravated battery, two counts of Class C felony criminal recklessness and Class A misdemeanor battery resulting in bodily injury.

Michael E. Mattingly v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development, and Meijer Stores Limited Partnership (NFP)
93A02-1304-EX-383
Agency action. Affirms denial of unemployment benefits.

Bruce Jones v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1304-CR-363
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A misdemeanor carrying a handgun without a license.

In the Matter of the Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of B.B. and B.B. (Minor Children), A.S. (Mother) v. The Indiana Department of Child Services (NFP)
49A02-1305-JT-431
Juvenile. Affirms denial of mother’s motion for relief from judgment following termination of parental rights.

Michael T. Smith v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A04-1304-CR-172
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class C felony child molesting.

Challie A. Gray v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1306-CR-534  
Criminal. Affirms murder conviction.

Antonio D. Johnson v. State of Indiana (NFP)
48A04-1305-CR-241
Criminal. Affirms revocation of probation.

Kevin Joseph Cherrone v. State of Indiana (NFP)
71A03-1305-CR-187
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A misdemeanor domestic battery.

Tabitha Edwards v. State of Indiana (NFP)
29A02-1305-CR-444
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class A misdemeanor operating a vehicle while intoxicated endangering a person and Class D felony operating a vehicle while intoxicated with a prior within five years.

Justin Kyle Loy v. State of Indiana (NFP)
48A04-1303-CR-148
Criminal. Affirms order revoking probation.

J.F. v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A04-1305-JV-247
Juvenile. Affirms adjudication as a delinquent child for committing what would be Class D felony theft if committed by an adult.

Reginald Binion v. State of Indiana (NFP)
45A05-1304-CR-177
Criminal. Affirms 15-year sentence following guilty plea to Class B felony attempted armed robbery.

The Indiana Supreme Court and Tax Court posted no opinions by IL deadline. The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals posted no Indiana decisions by IL deadline.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Such things are no more elections than those in the late, unlamented Soviet Union.

  2. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  3. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  4. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  5. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

ADVERTISEMENT