ILNews

Opinions Jan. 26, 2012

January 26, 2012
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

7th Circuit Court of Appeals had posted no Indiana opinions at IL deadline.

Indiana Supreme Court and Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.


Indiana Court of Appeals
Jeff Reeves v. Citizens Financial Services
93A02-1107-EX-604
Agency appeal. Affirms Worker’s Compensation Board’s decision that Reeves had reached maximum medical improvement, had a permanent partial impairment of five percent and wasn’t entitled to ongoing palliative care. Reeves failed to identify what type of care he should receive and the undisputed evidence does not show that palliative care limits the extent of his impairment.

Associated Estates Realty Corporation v. Angela Mason (NFP)
49A02-1105-CT-426
Civil tort. Grants rehearing and affirms original decision to reverse the denial of Associated Estates Realty Corp.’s motion for relief from judgment.

Duane R. Tackett v. State of Indiana (NFP)
18A05-1101-CR-7
Criminal. Affirms convictions of and sentence for Class B felonies rape, sexual misconduct with a minor and criminal deviate conduct and Class D felony child solicitation.

Richard H. Edwards v. State of Indiana (NFP)
19A04-1101-CR-26
Criminal. Affirms revocation of probation.

Meridian S.E.T., LLC v. Auditor of Marion County, Assessor of Marion County, and City of Indianapolis/Marion County (NFP)
49A02-1106-PL-482
Civil plenary. Affirms summary judgment in favor of the auditor, assessor and city of Indianapolis.

Moustapha Barry v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1105-CR-565
Criminal. Affirms conviction of and sentence for Class B felony dealing in cocaine.

Diana Bible v. St. Vincent Hospital (NFP)
93A02-1107-EX-600
Agency appeal. Affirms decision to deny claim for workers’ compensation benefits.

James Patrick Flinn v. Courtney Sue Flinn and James Erick Flinn (NFP)
43A04-1108-PL-455
Civil plenary. Reverses grant of Courtney Flinn’s motion for summary judgment on James Patrick Flinn’s complaint for conversion. Remands for further proceedings.

Casey Jackson v. State of Indiana (NFP)
67A01-1108-CR-340
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A misdemeanor battery resulting in bodily injury.

Ruth Dishman, Personal Rep. of the Estate of Julie A. Etchison v. Community Hospitals of Indiana, Inc., Medcheck Anderson, Troy Abbott, M.C., and Stephen Robertson (NFP)
48A02-1105-PL-467
Civil plenary. Affirms grant of partial summary judgment in favor of the medical defendants and Stephen Robertson in conjunction with a proposed complaint for medical malpractice.

Dairius Redding v. State of Indiana (NFP)
71A03-1107-CR-294
Criminal. Affirms decision to admit results of a buccal swab DNA analysis at trial and the finding of aggravating factors at sentencing.

Angelina M. Sanders v. State of Indiana (NFP)
20A03-1106-CR-297
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class D felony domestic battery in the presence of a child.

Stacey Sills v. State of Indiana (NFP)
90A02-1107-CR-615
Criminal. Affirms sentence following guilty plea to two counts of Class C felony child molesting and one count of Class C felony child exploitation.

Lawrence Peterson and Fredrick Edmond v. Bruce Lemmon, et al. (NFP)
48A05-1102-MI-430
Miscellaneous. Affirms order granting a motion to dismiss action for mandate.

Jonathan Paugh v. State of Indiana (NFP)
67A01-1107-CR-298
Criminal. Reverses finding that Paugh is a credit restricted felon.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Hmmmmm ..... How does the good doctor's spells work on tyrants and unelected bureacrats with nearly unchecked power employing in closed hearings employing ad hoc procedures? Just askin'. ... Happy independence day to any and all out there who are "free" ... Unlike me.

  2. Today, I want to use this opportunity to tell everyone about Dr agbuza of agbuzaodera(at)gmail. com, on how he help me reunited with my husband after 2 months of divorce.My husband divorce me because he saw another woman in his office and he said to me that he is no longer in love with me anymore and decide to divorce me.I seek help from the Net and i saw good talk about Dr agbuza and i contact him and explain my problem to him and he cast a spell for me which i use to get my husband back within 2 days.am totally happy because there is no reparations and side-effect. If you need his help Email him at agbuzaodera(at)gmail. com

  3. The practitioners and judges who hail E-filing as the Saviour of the West need to contain their respective excitements. E-filing is federal court requires the practitioner to cram his motion practice into pigeonholes created by IT people. Compound motions or those seeking alternative relief are effectively barred, unless the practitioner wants to receive a tart note from some functionary admonishing about the "problem". E-filing is just another method by which courts and judges transfer their burden to practitioners, who are the really the only powerless components of the system. Of COURSE it is easier for the court to require all of its imput to conform to certain formats, but this imposition does NOT improve the quality of the practice of law and does NOT improve the ability of the practitioner to advocate for his client or to fashion pleadings that exactly conform to his client's best interests. And we should be very wary of the disingenuous pablum about the costs. The courts will find a way to stick it to the practitioner. Lake County is a VERY good example of this rapaciousness. Any one who does not believe this is invited to review the various special fees that system imposes upon practitioners- as practitioners- and upon each case ON TOP of the court costs normal in every case manually filed. Jurisprudence according to Aldous Huxley.

  4. Any attorneys who practice in federal court should be able to say the same as I can ... efiling is great. I have been doing it in fed court since it started way back. Pacer has its drawbacks, but the ability to hit an e-docket and pull up anything and everything onscreen is a huge plus for a litigator, eps the sole practitioner, who lacks a filing clerk and the paralegal support of large firms. Were I an Indiana attorney I would welcome this great step forward.

  5. Can we get full disclosure on lobbyist's payments to legislatures such as Mr Buck? AS long as there are idiots that are disrespectful of neighbors and intent on shooting fireworks every night, some kind of regulations are needed.

ADVERTISEMENT