ILNews

Opinions Jan. 27, 2011

January 27, 2011
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Supreme Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Tony E. Bennett v. State of Indiana (NFP)
25A03-1008-CR-422
Criminal. Affirms sentence following guilty plea to three counts of Class D felony theft.

Guadalupe Torres v. State of Indiana (NFP)
71A03-1007-CR-383
Criminal. Affirms convictions of murder and Class C felony assisting a criminal.

David P. Pollack v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1006-CR-642
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class B misdemeanor battery.

Robert A.C. Murphy v. State of Indiana (NFP)
18A02-1003-CR-299
Criminal. Affirms conviction of and sentence for murder.

Barbara R. Ball v. State of Indiana (NFP)
71A04-1009-CR-554
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class D felonies resisting law enforcement and dealing in marijuana.

Steve Nevill v. Woodland Heights Property Owners Assoc., et al. (NFP)
67A01-1007-SC-360
Small claim. Affirms judgment in favor of the association in its action for unpaid property owners’ association dues and late fees and judgment against Nevill on his counterclaim for slander, defamation, and dereliction of duties.

Terrace Garden Association, Inc. v. Len C. Lantz, et al. (NFP)
76A05-1004-MI-258
Miscellaneous. Affirms judgment for the Reiths in Terrace Garden’s action to quiet title and for adverse possession regarding a 30-foot parcel of real estate that was originally filed against Lantz.

Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Well, maybe it's because they are unelected, and, they have a tendency to strike down laws by elected officials from all over the country. When you have been taught that "Democracy" is something almost sacred, then, you will have a tendency to frown on such imperious conduct. Lawyers get acculturated in law school into thinking that this is the very essence of high minded government, but to people who are more heavily than King George ever did, they may not like it. Thanks for the information.

  2. I pd for a bankruptcy years ago with Mr Stiles and just this week received a garnishment from my pay! He never filed it even though he told me he would! Don't let this guy practice law ever again!!!

  3. Excellent initiative on the part of the AG. Thankfully someone takes action against predators taking advantage of people who have already been through the wringer. Well done!

  4. Conour will never turn these funds over to his defrauded clients. He tearfully told the court, and his daughters dutifully pledged in interviews, that his first priority is to repay every dime of the money he stole from his clients. Judge Young bought it, much to the chagrin of Conour’s victims. Why would Conour need the $2,262 anyway? Taxpayers are now supporting him, paying for his housing, utilities, food, healthcare, and clothing. If Conour puts the money anywhere but in the restitution fund, he’s proved, once again, what a con artist he continues to be and that he has never had any intention of repaying his clients. Judge Young will be proven wrong... again; Conour has no remorse and the Judge is one of the many conned.

  5. Pass Legislation to require guilty defendants to pay for the costs of lab work, etc as part of court costs...

ADVERTISEMENT