7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United
States v. Jason Smith
Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division. U.S. Judge Robert Miller, Jr.
11-2016
Criminal. Affirms District Court’s denial of motion to suppress evidence and motion for acquittal for a man convicted
of being a felon in possession of a firearm, possessing crack cocaine with intent to deliver and possessing a firearm in furtherance
of a drug transaction. The court rejected arguments that Jason Smith didn’t commit a traffic infraction and that the
government constructively amended his indictment about when the traffic stop occurred.
The Indiana Supreme and Indiana Tax Court had issued no opinions by IL deadline.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Steven Jackson v. State of Indiana
31A01-1109-PC-412
Post conviction. Affirms court’s order partially granting a post-conviction relief petition but denying appellant-defendant’s
request to accept a proffered agreement in that PCR proceeding. Holds the post-conviction court wasn’t required to accept
the requirement because a PCR proceeding isn’t the equivalent of a civil proceeding and the Indiana Supreme Court has
said a post-conviction court has final authority in accepting agreements.
Deborah L. Dysert v. Review Board of the Indiana Dept. of Workforce Development and the Indiana Supreme
Court (NFP)
93A02-1105-EX-392
Civil. Affirms determination of Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development that Dubois County Chief
Deputy Prosecutor Deborah Dysert’s employer discharged her for just cause.
Robert O. Broyles v. State of Indiana (NFP)
48A02-1103-CR-338
Criminal. Affirms trial court’s aggregate eight-year sentence for a man convicted of voyeurism, child solicitation
and sexual misconduct with a minor.
Daniel Minnick v. State of Indiana (NFP)
92A03-1106-CR-228
Criminal. Affirms two misdemeanor drunk driving convictions and a speeding infraction on grounds that sufficient evidence
existed and the trial court didn’t violate a defendant’s federal and state rights to confrontation when admitting
a breath test instrument into evidence without live testimony from the technician who inspected the device.
Thomas Curry v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1106-CR-551
Criminal. Affirms a Class C felony burglary conviction on grounds that sufficient evidence existed to support the conviction.
Edward Chandler v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A05-1107-PC-396
Post conviction. Affirms the denial of a successive petition for post-conviction relief on grounds that the evidence would
lead to an opposite conclusion than that reached by the court.














Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.
Forcing a defendant to wear a stun belt, in court or otherwise, is a violation of american principles! It is also unconstitutional!
So, if I save $100.00 cash per week, from my $500.00 per week paycheck, for 50 years, at which time, I will have saved $260,000.00, the government can raid my home and take my money, just by saying it is drug money! Shouldn't the government, have some kind of evidence of drugs, rather, than just saying we are the government and we will take anything you own, anytime we choose? Tyranny is upon us! If you don't know your rights, you don't have any!