7th Circuit Court of Appeals
USA
v. Timothy Redd
09-3799
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Fort Wayne Division, Judge Theresa L. Springmann
Criminal. Affirms District Court’s denial of Redd’s successive §3582(c)(2) motion to reduce his sentence.
Redd’s sentence was reduced from 405 months to 327 months after the Sentencing Commission made the reduction in the
guideline ranges for crack offenses retroactive. In a motion filed 10 months after his sentence was reduced, Redd claimed
his reduction was not as much as it should have been. 7th Circuit concludes Redd let the time for reconsideration or appeal
of the district judge’s resentencing expire without action.
Indiana Supreme Court posted no opinions before IL deadline.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Termination of Parent-Child Relationship of D.S., et al.; D.H. & D.S. v. Indiana Department of
Child Services (NFP)
20A04-1006-JT-377
Juvenile. Affirms termination of parent-child relationship of D.H. (mother) and D.S. (father) and their eight children.
Indiana Tax Court posted no opinions before IL deadline.
The Indiana Supreme Court granted one transfer and denied three for the week ending Dec. 31, 2010.
on Facebook & Twitter
Back to Top
I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.