7th Circuit Court of Appeals had posted no opinions at IL deadline.
Indiana Supreme Court and Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.
Indiana Court of Appeals
In the Matter of the Estate of Florian T. Latek; Nicholas G. Grapsas, et al. v. Gerald Ronneau
64A05-1103-ES-112
Estate, supervised. Affirms denial of Grapsas and Padezan’s challenge to the trial court order denying their motion
to dismiss a petition for probate of will and for issuance of letters testamentary filed in the Porter Superior Court and
a separate order admitting to probate the last will and testament of Florian Latek. Indiana adheres to the majority rule,
and under that rule, the Illinois court’s denial of Latek’s will to probate because it failed to comply with that
state’s statutory execution requirements has no effect on the subsequent admission and probate of Latek’s will
in Indiana as it concerns the disposition of real property located in Indiana.
Santos Ulloa v. State of Indiana (NFP)
09A05-1107-CR-358
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class B misdemeanor public intoxication.
Deshawn Grigsby v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1105-CR-446
Criminal. Affirms convictions of felony murder and two counts of Class B felony robbery. Remands for the trial court to vacate
the conviction of and sentence for Class A felony attempted robbery on double jeopardy grounds.














vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.