ILNews

Opinions July 15, 2011

July 15, 2011
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Supreme Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Estate of Wilgus S. Gibbs, Sr.
81A01-1011-ES-560
Estate. Affirms grant of summary judgment in favor of Wilgus Gibbs Jr., individually and as a personal representative of the estate and executor of the will of Wilgus Gibbs Sr. Gibbs Sr.’s granddaughters failed to rebut the presumption of regularity in the execution of his will that is established by the self-proving clause. There is also no evidence of undue influence or that the will was the result of a mistake or fraud.

Charles Meek v. State of Indiana
49A02-1009-CR-964
Criminal. Affirms denial of Meek’s motion to suppress evidence discovered during a warrantless search of him during a Terry stop of his car. Meek’s admittance to smoking marijuana earlier in the day and to having a handgun on him, along with the police officer’s failure to find the source of the odor in the car and the absence of marijuana on his passenger, supported the subsequent and more thorough pat-down search of Meek that led to the discovery of contraband.

Myron Pryor v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1009-CR-1176
Criminal. Affirms denial of petition for permission to file a belated notice of appeal.

Shamar D. Shelton v. State of Indiana (NFP)
02A03-1010-CR-571
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class D felony receiving stolen property.

Term. of Parent-Child Rel. of A.M.C.; A.C. v. I.D.C.S. (NFP)
28A01-1102-JT-81
Juvenile. Affirms involuntary termination of parental rights.

Meshach Berry v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1011-CR-1218
Criminal. Reverses denial of permission to file a belated notice of appeal. Remands for further proceedings.

Jason L. Clark v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-0810-CR-949
Criminal. Affirms convictions of murder, Class D felony criminal recklessness, and Class A misdemeanor carrying a handgun without a license.

Gary Singleton v. State of Indiana (NFP)
20A03-1010-CR-575
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class A felony dealing in cocaine and Class A misdemeanor possession of marijuana.

Rodney R. Jett v. State of Indiana (NFP)
24A01-1012-CR-24
Criminal. Affirms sentence of six years for Class C felony battery.

Aaron Fromer v. State of Indiana (NFP)
03A04-1008-CR-520
Criminal. Affirms denial of petition for additional credit time.

Jeffrey Cole v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1011-CR-1215
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A misdemeanor criminal trespass.

Shane Cummings v. State of Indiana (NFP)
20A03-1009-CR-537
Criminal. Affirms convictions of five counts of child molesting – one as a Class C felony, three as Class A felonies, and one as a Class B felony.

Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. What a fine article, thank you! I can testify firsthand and by detailed legal reports (at end of this note) as to the dire consequences of rejecting this truth from the fine article above: "The inclusion and expansion of this right [to jury] in Indiana’s Constitution is a clear reflection of our state’s intention to emphasize the importance of every Hoosier’s right to make their case in front of a jury of their peers." Over $20? Every Hoosier? Well then how about when your very vocation is on the line? How about instead of a jury of peers, one faces a bevy of political appointees, mini-czars, who care less about due process of the law than the real czars did? Instead of trial by jury, trial by ideological ordeal run by Orwellian agents? Well that is built into more than a few administrative law committees of the Ind S.Ct., and it is now being weaponized, as is revealed in articles posted at this ezine, to root out post moderns heresies like refusal to stand and pledge allegiance to all things politically correct. My career was burned at the stake for not so saluting, but I think I was just one of the early logs. Due, at least in part, to the removal of the jury from bar admission and bar discipline cases, many more fires will soon be lit. Perhaps one awaits you, dear heretic? Oh, at that Ind. article 12 plank about a remedy at law for every damage done ... ah, well, the founders evidently meant only for those damages done not by the government itself, rabid statists that they were. (Yes, that was sarcasm.) My written reports available here: Denied petition for cert (this time around): http://tinyurl.com/zdmawmw Denied petition for cert (from the 2009 denial and five year banishment): http://tinyurl.com/zcypybh Related, not written by me: Amicus brief: http://tinyurl.com/hvh7qgp

  2. Justice has finally been served. So glad that Dr. Ley can finally sleep peacefully at night knowing the truth has finally come to the surface.

  3. While this right is guaranteed by our Constitution, it has in recent years been hampered by insurance companies, i.e.; the practice of the plaintiff's own insurance company intervening in an action and filing a lien against any proceeds paid to their insured. In essence, causing an additional financial hurdle for a plaintiff to overcome at trial in terms of overall award. In a very real sense an injured party in exercise of their right to trial by jury may be the only party in a cause that would end up with zero compensation.

  4. Why in the world would someone need a person to correct a transcript when a realtime court reporter could provide them with a transcript (rough draft) immediately?

  5. This article proved very enlightening. Right ahead of sitting the LSAT for the first time, I felt a sense of relief that a score of 141 was admitted to an Indiana Law School and did well under unique circumstances. While my GPA is currently 3.91 I fear standardized testing and hope that I too will get a good enough grade for acceptance here at home. Thanks so much for this informative post.

ADVERTISEMENT