ILNews

Opinions July 19, 2013

July 19, 2013
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Court of Appeals
Kenneth Scholz v. Lorraine Kirk (NFP)
37A03-1211-PL-493
Civil plenary. Affirms the trial court’s determination of the amount of damages for the rental income for the farmland. Reverses award of prejudgment interest to Kirk.

Sean Johnson v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1301-CR-8
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A misdemeanor dealing marijuana and remands with instructions to vacate Johnson’s conviction for Class A misdemeanor possession of marijuana because of a double jeopardy violation.

Dennis Tiller v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1211-CR-928
Criminal. Affirms convictions of two counts of child molesting, one as a Class A felony and one as a Class C felony.

David A. Wilson v. State of Indiana (NFP)
55A05-1211-CR-606
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A misdemeanor resisting law enforcement.

Jesus Mondragon v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A04-1212-CR-635
Criminal. Affirms conviction of domestic battery as a Class A misdemeanor.

Kathay Van Dyne v. IOM Health Systems LP, d/b/a Lutheran Hospital of Indiana (NFP)
02A04-1211-CT-572
Civil tort. Affirms summary judgment for Lutheran Hospital on Van Dyne’s negligence lawsuit filed on behalf of herself and her husband’s estate.

In the Matter of the Term. of the Parent-Child Rel. of: I.M.A. and L.R.A. (Minor Children), and M.M.H. (Mother) v. Indiana Department of Child Services (NFP)
02A04-1212-JT-634
Juvenile. Affirms termination of parental rights.

Terrence Morris v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A05-1301-CR-2
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class B misdemeanor battery.

A.M.D., a Minor by his Parents and Guardians, John Doe and Jane Doe, and John Doe and Jane Doe, Individually v. Young Men's Christian Assoc. of Greater Indianapolis (NFP)
49A04-1211-CT-551
Civil tort. Reverses summary judgment in favor of the YMCA on A.M.D.’s lawsuit alleging negligence.

Lake County Trust Company, Trust 4210, Trust 5061, and Alex Emmanoilidis v. Aox, Inc., and Brian Piunti (NFP)
45A03-1207-PL-309
Civil plenary. Affirms a jury verdict against the trust company as landlord for breach of lease and malicious prosecution.

Louis Cole v. State of Indiana (NFP)
22A01-1211-CR-506
Criminal. Affirms conviction of resisting law enforcement as a Class D felony.

The Indiana Supreme Court and Tax Court posted no opinions by IL deadline. The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals posted no Indiana decisions by IL deadline.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Residents can't vote under our current system? Okay, let's replace the system with another system where they can't vote. Yeah, that's the ticket!

  2. It's an appreciable step taken by the government to curb the child abuse that are happening in the schools. Employees in the schools those are selected without background check can not be trusted. A thorough background check on the teachers or any other other new employees must be performed to choose the best and quality people. Those who are already employed in the past should also be checked for best precaution. The future of kids can be saved through this simple process. However, the checking process should be conducted by the help of a trusted background checking agency(https://www.affordablebackgroundchecks.com/).

  3. Almost everything connects to internet these days. From your computers and Smartphones to wearable gadgets and smart refrigerators in your home, everything is linked to the Internet. Although this convenience empowers usto access our personal devices from anywhere in the world such as an IP camera, it also deprives control of our online privacy. Cyber criminals, hackers, spies and everyone else has realized that we don’t have complete control on who can access our personal data. We have to take steps to to protect it like keeping Senseless password. Dont leave privacy unprotected. Check out this article for more ways: https://www.purevpn.com/blog/data-privacy-in-the-age-of-internet-of-things/

  4. You need to look into Celadon not paying sign on bonuses. We call get the run

  5. My parents took advantage of the fact that I was homeless in 2012 and went to court and got Legal Guardianship I my 2 daughters. I am finally back on my feet and want them back, but now they want to fight me on it. I want to raise my children and have them almost all the time on the weekends. Mynparents are both almost 70 years old and they play favorites which bothers me a lot. Do I have a leg to stand on if I go to court to terminate lehal guardianship? My kids want to live with me and I want to raise them, this was supposed to be temporary, and now it is turning into a fight. Ridiculous

ADVERTISEMENT