7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Marion
County Coroner’s Office v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and John Linehan
09-3595
Petition for review of an order of the EEOC. Upholds the EEOC determination that Coroner Ackles’ stated reason for
taking action against Linehan was pretextual and that the EEOC had jurisdiction over Linehan’s retaliation claim. Reduces
the compensatory damage award from $200,000 to a suggested $20,000. If the respondents do not consent to the remittitur, there
will be a new hearing on the issue.
Prime
Eagle Group Ltd., as assignee of the claims of Nakornthai Strip Mill Public Co. Ltd. v. Steel Dynamics Inc.
09-1663
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Fort Wayne Division, Judge James T. Moody.
Civil. Affirms judgment for Steel Dynamics in Prime Eagle’s suit that Steel Dynamics must pay damages in tort for withdrawing
from a steel mill venture in Asia. Nakornthai’s injury began no later than July 1999 and the company had knowledge of
the injury then, so its suit is beyond the statute of limitations.
Indiana Supreme Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Steven
Spangler and Heidi Brown v. Barbara Bechtel, Expectations Women's Health & Child Bearing Center, et al.
49A05-0908-CV-482
Civil. Reverses summary judgment in favor of the defendants in Spangler and Brown’s suit for wrongful death and emotional
distress after their child was stillborn. The parents have a valid claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress based
on Brown’s direct involvement in the stillbirth. Holds that a mother who suffers a stillbirth due to medical malpractice
qualifies as an injured patient and satisfies the actual victim requirement under the Medical Malpractice Act regardless of
whether the malpractice resulted in injuries to the mother, the fetus, or both, and the parents may assert a claim for negligent
infliction of emotional distress under Shuamber’s modified impact rule.
David
A. Calvert v. State of Indiana
40A05-0911-CR-659
Criminal. Reverses conviction of Class B felony attempted robbery with a deadly weapon because the state failed to prove
a substantial step. Calvert’s conviction of possession of a sawed-off shotgun as a Class D felony violates double jeopardy.
Affirms convictions of Class B felony possession of a firearm as a serious violent felon. Affirms sentence and remands with
instructions. Judge Kirsch dissents in part.
E.W.
Revocable Trust
29A02-0910-CV-1004
Civil. Affirms order that the trustee pay the beneficiaries’ attorney fees, the reduction of the requested trustee
fees, and the reduction of the amount of trustee’s attorney fees to be borne by the trust. The trustee breached duties
owed to the objecting beneficiaries. Reverses order that the trustee bear the remaining portion of his attorney fees personally.
Cornelius
Tyrone Lacey, Sr. v. State of Indiana
02A05-0910-CR-562
Criminal. Reverses denial of motion to suppress evidence obtained during the execution of a search warrant. There was probable
cause for the issuance of the search warrant but the unilateral decision to dispense with the knock-and-announce rule was
unreasonable under the Indiana Constitution. Judge Barnes concurs in result.
Damion
Wilkins v. State of Indiana
02A03-0910-CR-451
Criminal. Reverses denial of motion to suppress evidence obtained during the execution of a search warrant. There was probable
cause for the issuance of the search warrant but the unilateral decision to dispense with the knock-and-announce rule was
unreasonable under the Indiana Constitution. Judge Barnes concurs in result.
Cedric
Lewis v. State of Indiana
49A02-0908-CR-736
Criminal. Reverses conviction of Class B felony possession of a firearm by a serious violent felon. The state failed to satisfy
its burden of showing that the warrantless search of the vehicle and the seizure of the gun were satisfied. Judge Kirsch concurs
in result; Judge Mathias dissents.
Bradford
Drake v. State of Indiana (NFP)
55A01-0912-CR-577
Criminal. Affirms sentence for two convictions of attempted murder as Class A felonies.
Term.
of Parent-Child Rel. of M.D.; M.C. v. I.D.C.S. (NFP)
34A02-1001-JT-156
Juvenile. Affirms termination of parental rights.
Dionte-Daymone
Jones v. State of Indiana (NFP)
45A05-1001-CR-4
Criminal. Affirms sentence following guilty plea to Class D felony auto theft.
Daniel
Brownlee v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-0912-CR-1259
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class C felony burglary and Class D felony attempted theft.
James
Eiteljorg, et al. v. Ralph E. Lean (NFP)
49A05-0912-CV-679
Civil. Reverses denial of Eiteljorg and Bharti’s motion for summary judgment in an action brought by Lean seeking contribution
from them for violations of the Indiana Securities Law. Remands with instructions.
Daniel
J. Emery v. State of Indiana (NFP)
52A04-0910-PC-583
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief.
Associated
Builders & Contractors Indiana Chapter, Inc., et al. v. Lori A. Torres (NFP)
49A02-0910-CV-995
Civil. Grants rehearing but affirms original opinion in all respects regarding the dismissal of the builders’ complaint
for lack of standing.
Robert
Emerson v. State of Indiana (NFP)
71A03-1001-CR-26
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class C felony battery.
Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.














The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.