ILNews

Opinions July 28, 2011

July 28, 2011
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Supreme Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Jason Keigley v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A04-1012-CR-743
Criminal. Affirms convictions of and sentence for Class C felony identity deception and five counts of Class D felony fraud in loan brokering.

Michael Yates v. State of Indiana (NFP)
34A05-1009-CR-582
Criminal. Affirms convictions of felony aiding, inducing, or causing murder and two counts of aiding, inducing, or causing attempted murder as Class A felonies.

Christina Smith v. Trilogy Health Services (NFP)
67A05-1006-PL-644
Civil plenary. Reverses order Smith pay $1,000 in attorney fees to Trilogy Health Services as a sanction for a discovery dispute. Remands for further proceedings.

Metals & Additives Corp., Inc., et al. v. Dagoberto Hornedo, et al. (NFP)
49A02-1011-PL-1213
Civil plenary. Affirms denial of Metals & Additives Corp.’s request for injunctive relief seeking to prevent Hornedo and St. Louis Group from using MAC trade secrets and alleging Hornedo breached his fiduciary duties.

Kimberly A. Kelley v. State of Indiana (NFP)
45A04-1010-CR-638
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A felony neglect of a dependent, revises the sentence to the advisory sentence, and remands with instructions to vacate the Class A felony battery conviction and sentence.

Betty Nolot v. Richard A. Nolot, et al. (NFP)
22A01-1012-PL-643
Civil plenary. Affirms denial of summary judgment for Richard Nolot as to the invasion of privacy claim and the grant of summary judgment for Richard on the trespass claim. Reverses grant of summary judgment for Richard on the conversion, unjust enrichment, and replevin claims. Remands for further proceedings.

Johnnie Gustafson v. State of Indiana (NFP)
05A04-1010-CR-647
Criminal. Affirms sentence following guilty plea to Class D felony possession of a controlled substance.

Marvin Ervin v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A05-1107-CR-347; 49A02-1002-CR-123
Criminal. On remand from Indiana Supreme Court, affirms conviction of Class D felony theft and adjudication as a habitual offender.

Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. First comment on this thread is a fitting final comment on this thread, as that the MCBA never answered Duncan's fine question, and now even Eric Holder agrees that the MCBA was in material error as to the facts: "I don't get it" from Duncan December 1, 2014 5:10 PM "The Grand Jury met for 25 days and heard 70 hours of testimony according to this article and they made a decision that no crime occurred. On what basis does the MCBA conclude that their decision was "unjust"? What special knowledge or evidence does the MCBA have that the Grand Jury hearing this matter was unaware of? The system that we as lawyers are sworn to uphold made a decision that there was insufficient proof that officer committed a crime. How can any of us say we know better what was right than the jury that actually heard all of the the evidence in this case."

  2. wow is this a bunch of bs! i know the facts!

  3. MCBA .... time for a new release about your entire membership (or is it just the alter ego) being "saddened and disappointed" in the failure to lynch a police officer protecting himself in the line of duty. But this time against Eric Holder and the Federal Bureau of Investigation: "WASHINGTON — Justice Department lawyers will recommend that no civil rights charges be brought against the police officer who fatally shot an unarmed teenager in Ferguson, Mo., after an F.B.I. investigation found no evidence to support charges, law enforcement officials said Wednesday." http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/22/us/justice-department-ferguson-civil-rights-darren-wilson.html?ref=us&_r=0

  4. Dr wail asfour lives 3 hours from the hospital,where if he gets an emergency at least he needs three hours,while even if he is on call he should be in a location where it gives him max 10 minutes to be beside the patient,they get paid double on their on call days ,where look how they handle it,so if the death of the patient occurs on weekend and these doctors still repeat same pattern such issue should be raised,they should be closer to the patient.on other hand if all the death occured on the absence of the Dr and the nurses handle it,the nurses should get trained how to function appearntly they not that good,if the Dr lives 3 hours far from the hospital on his call days he should sleep in the hospital

  5. It's a capital offense...one for you Latin scholars..

ADVERTISEMENT