ILNews

Opinions July 28, 2011

July 28, 2011
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Supreme Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Jason Keigley v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A04-1012-CR-743
Criminal. Affirms convictions of and sentence for Class C felony identity deception and five counts of Class D felony fraud in loan brokering.

Michael Yates v. State of Indiana (NFP)
34A05-1009-CR-582
Criminal. Affirms convictions of felony aiding, inducing, or causing murder and two counts of aiding, inducing, or causing attempted murder as Class A felonies.

Christina Smith v. Trilogy Health Services (NFP)
67A05-1006-PL-644
Civil plenary. Reverses order Smith pay $1,000 in attorney fees to Trilogy Health Services as a sanction for a discovery dispute. Remands for further proceedings.

Metals & Additives Corp., Inc., et al. v. Dagoberto Hornedo, et al. (NFP)
49A02-1011-PL-1213
Civil plenary. Affirms denial of Metals & Additives Corp.’s request for injunctive relief seeking to prevent Hornedo and St. Louis Group from using MAC trade secrets and alleging Hornedo breached his fiduciary duties.

Kimberly A. Kelley v. State of Indiana (NFP)
45A04-1010-CR-638
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A felony neglect of a dependent, revises the sentence to the advisory sentence, and remands with instructions to vacate the Class A felony battery conviction and sentence.

Betty Nolot v. Richard A. Nolot, et al. (NFP)
22A01-1012-PL-643
Civil plenary. Affirms denial of summary judgment for Richard Nolot as to the invasion of privacy claim and the grant of summary judgment for Richard on the trespass claim. Reverses grant of summary judgment for Richard on the conversion, unjust enrichment, and replevin claims. Remands for further proceedings.

Johnnie Gustafson v. State of Indiana (NFP)
05A04-1010-CR-647
Criminal. Affirms sentence following guilty plea to Class D felony possession of a controlled substance.

Marvin Ervin v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A05-1107-CR-347; 49A02-1002-CR-123
Criminal. On remand from Indiana Supreme Court, affirms conviction of Class D felony theft and adjudication as a habitual offender.

Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. My daughters' kids was removed from the home in March 2015, she has been in total compliance with the requirements of cps, she is going to court on the 4th of August. Cps had called the first team meeting last Monday to inform her that she was not in compliance, by not attending home based therapy, which is done normally with the children in the home, and now they are recommending her to have a psych evaluation, and they are also recommending that the children not be returned to the home. This is all bull hockey. In this so called team meeting which I did attend for the best interest of my child and grandbabies, I learned that no matter how much she does that cps is not trying to return the children and the concerns my daughter has is not important to cps, they only told her that she is to do as they say and not to resist or her rights will be terminated. I cant not believe the way Cps treats people knowing if they threaten you with loosing your kids you will do anything to get them back. My daughter is drug free she has never put her hands on any of her children she does not scream at her babies at all, but she is only allowed to see her kids 6 hours a week and someone has to supervise. Lets all tske a stand against the child protection services. THEY CAN NO LONGER TAKE CHILDREN FROM THERE PARENTS.

  2. Planned Parenthood has the government so trained . . .

  3. In a related story, an undercover video team released this footage of the government's search of the Planned Parenthood facilities. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXVN7QJ8m88

  4. Here is an excellent movie for those wanting some historical context, as well as encouragement to stand against dominant political forces and knaves who carry the staves of governance to enforce said dominance: http://www.copperheadthemovie.com/

  5. Not enough copperheads here to care anymore, is my guess. Otherwise, a totally pointless gesture. ... Oh wait: was this done because somebody want to avoid bad press - or was it that some weak kneed officials cravenly fear "protest" violence by "urban youths.."

ADVERTISEMENT