ILNews

Opinions July 6, 2011

July 6, 2011
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Supreme Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.

Indiana Court of Appeals
J.L., Child Alleged to be C.H.I.N.S.; J.L. v. I.D.C.S.
32A01-1010-JC-532
Juvenile CHINS. Affirms trial court’s finding that mother’s two sons are children in need of services, because of the mother’s repeated unsubstantiated claims that the father was abusing the boys.

James W. Oldham v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1009-CR-974
Criminal. Affirms convictions of two counts of Class B felony robbery and two counts of Class B felony criminal confinement.

Aaron Aaron v. State of Indiana (NFP)
34A02-1101-CR-187
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A misdemeanor operating a vehicle while intoxicated.

Nynthia Richardson v. BAC Home Loans Services L.P., et al. (NFP)
27A02-1011-MF-1206
Mortgage foreclosure. Affirms trial court’s denial of motion to set aside a default judgment entered in favor of BAC Home Loans Servicing.

S.R. v. Review Board (NFP)
93A02-1011-EX-1233
Civil. Affirms decision by Indiana Department of Workforce Development’s Review Board that Stephen Riner voluntarily left employment without good cause and is not eligible for unemployment benefits.

Roy L. Harrison v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1010-CR-1094
Criminal. Reverses trial court’s revocation of probation, holding that a probable cause affidavit was filed improperly and therefore cannot be used to establish an alleged probation violation. Remands for new hearing on probation revocation.

Douglas Mowry v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1009-CR-1017
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A misdemeanor domestic battery.

Patrick W. Scholl v. State of Indiana (NFP)
71A03-1012-CR-663
Criminal. Affirms trial court’s denial of motion to dismiss and affirms court’s authorization of lifetime driver’s license suspension.

Robert Hinton v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1012-CR-1330
Criminal. Affirms trial court’s denial of Robert Hinton’s motion to withdraw a guilty plea to Class A felony dealing in cocaine.

Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.




 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Future generations will be amazed that we prosecuted people for possessing a harmless plant. The New York Times came out in favor of legalization in Saturday's edition of the newspaper.

  2. Well, maybe it's because they are unelected, and, they have a tendency to strike down laws by elected officials from all over the country. When you have been taught that "Democracy" is something almost sacred, then, you will have a tendency to frown on such imperious conduct. Lawyers get acculturated in law school into thinking that this is the very essence of high minded government, but to people who are more heavily than King George ever did, they may not like it. Thanks for the information.

  3. I pd for a bankruptcy years ago with Mr Stiles and just this week received a garnishment from my pay! He never filed it even though he told me he would! Don't let this guy practice law ever again!!!

  4. Excellent initiative on the part of the AG. Thankfully someone takes action against predators taking advantage of people who have already been through the wringer. Well done!

  5. Conour will never turn these funds over to his defrauded clients. He tearfully told the court, and his daughters dutifully pledged in interviews, that his first priority is to repay every dime of the money he stole from his clients. Judge Young bought it, much to the chagrin of Conour’s victims. Why would Conour need the $2,262 anyway? Taxpayers are now supporting him, paying for his housing, utilities, food, healthcare, and clothing. If Conour puts the money anywhere but in the restitution fund, he’s proved, once again, what a con artist he continues to be and that he has never had any intention of repaying his clients. Judge Young will be proven wrong... again; Conour has no remorse and the Judge is one of the many conned.

ADVERTISEMENT