ILNews

Opinions July 7, 2010

July 7, 2010
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Supreme Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.

Indiana Court of Appeals

In the Matter of: A.C. v. State of Indiana

49A04-0912-JV-682
Juvenile. Reverses adjudication for committing what would be Class A misdemeanor resisting law enforcement if committed by an adult. A.C.’s simple failure to stand, without more, amounts to passive inaction and seems analogous to the failure to present one’s arms for handcuffing, which the Indiana Supreme Court has said does not constitute forcible resistance.

Leroy Jones v. State of Indiana
27A02-1002-CR-168
Criminal. Reverses convictions of two counts of dealing in cocaine, one as a Class A felony and one as a Class B felony. The evidence was not sufficient to prove Greentree was a family housing complex on the day in question and the jury could not have so found. Because the trial court erroneously instructed the jury as to the meaning of “family housing complex,” Jones’s dealing conviction under Count 1 was enhanced via a statute that, after the acts were committed, changed the elements of the crime with which he was charged. Remands for the Class A felony to be entered as a Class B felony and to re-sentence him consistent with the opinion.

Michael A. Balasquide v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-0912-CR-1238
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class A felony child molesting and Class B felony incest.

Theodore N. Hannibal v. State of Indiana (NFP)
34A02-1002-CR-130
Criminal. Affirms determination Hannibal is a habitual substance offender. Remands for an amendment to the sentencing order.

Tyshekia Burris v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-0911-CR-1133
Criminal. Reverses conviction of Class D felony criminal recklessness.

Sally G. Leonard v. United Farm Family Mutual, et al. (NFP)
71A03-0909-CV-444
Civil. Affirms summary judgment for United Farm Family Mutual on Leonard’s complaint for damages and declaratory relief based on a car accident.

Marco Hernandez-Lopez v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-0912-CR-1178
Criminal. Affirms sentence for Class A misdemeanor conversion.

Jonathan Graves v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-0912-CR-1284
Criminal. Affirms order revoking probation and ordering Graves serve two years of a previously suspended sentence.

Involuntary Commitment of R.C. (NFP)
49A02-0912-CV-1229
Civil. Affirms sufficiency of evidence to support order involuntarily committing R.C. to Community Hospital North Mental Health Center.

Christopher J. Geideman v. State of Indiana (NFP)
71A05-1002-CR-63
Criminal. Affirms convictions of and sentence for two counts of Class A misdemeanor battery and one count of Class D felony residential entry.

Kevin D. Risner v. State of Indiana (NFP)
75A03-0907-CR-300
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class D felonies operating a vehicle as a habitual traffic violator, and operating a vehicle while intoxicated with a previous conviction, and the finding Risner is a habitual substance offender.

Kurt O. Elder v. State of Indiana (NFP)
28A04-1002-CR-67
Criminal. Affirms order revoking six years of probation and requiring Elder to remain on probation through the date that he was previously scheduled to be released.

T.H., II et al., Alleged to be C.H.I.N.S.; T.H. & S.H. v. Monroe County Department of Child Services (NFP)
53A01-0911-JV-548
Juvenile. Affirms finding children are CHINS and order that they be removed from the home.

Matthew Baugh v. State of Indiana (NFP)
18A02-0911-CR-1155
Criminal. Affirms revocation of probation and imposition of the two-year sentence that had originally been suspended.

Brian L. Riker v. State of Indiana (NFP)
14A01-0909-CR-451
Criminal. Affirms convictions of two counts of Class B felony sexual misconduct with a minor, Class B felony attempted sexual misconduct with a minor, Class D felony sexual battery, and six counts of Class A misdemeanor contributing to the delinquency of a minor.

Harry Green, Jr. v. State of Indiana (NFP)
02A04-1003-CR-178
Criminal. Affirms sentence following guilty plea to Class D felony intimidation, Class C misdemeanor public nudity, Class C misdemeanor operating while intoxicated, and Class C misdemeanor operation of a motor vehicle by an unlicensed driver.

Robin Ann Parks v. Michael and Kathryn Grube (NFP)
83A05-0911-CV-652
Civil. Affirms order granting custody of Parks’ children to the Grubes.

Denise L. Black v. State of Indiana (NFP)
45A03-0912-CR-572
Criminal. Vacates eight-year executed sentence imposed following guilty plea to Class C felony reckless homicide and remands for imposition of a six-year executed sentence.

Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. So that none are misinformed by my posting wihtout a non de plume here, please allow me to state that I am NOT an Indiana licensed attorney, although I am an Indiana resident approved to practice law and represent clients in Indiana's fed court of Nth Dist and before the 7th circuit. I remain licensed in KS, since 1996, no discipline. This must be clarified since the IN court records will reveal that I did sit for and pass the Indiana bar last February. Yet be not confused by the fact that I was so allowed to be tested .... I am not, to be clear in the service of my duty to be absolutely candid about this, I AM NOT a member of the Indiana bar, and might never be so licensed given my unrepented from errors of thought documented in this opinion, at fn2, which likely supports Mr Smith's initial post in this thread: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1592921.html

  2. When I served the State of Kansas as Deputy AG over Consumer Protection & Antitrust for four years, supervising 20 special agents and assistant attorneys general (back before the IBLE denied me the right to practice law in Indiana for not having the right stuff and pretty much crushed my legal career) we had a saying around the office: Resist the lure of the ring!!! It was a take off on Tolkiem, the idea that absolute power (I signed investigative subpoenas as a judge would in many other contexts, no need to show probable cause)could corrupt absolutely. We feared that we would overreach constitutional limits if not reminded, over and over, to be mindful to not do so. Our approach in so challenging one another was Madisonian, as the following quotes from the Father of our Constitution reveal: The essence of Government is power; and power, lodged as it must be in human hands, will ever be liable to abuse. We are right to take alarm at the first experiment upon our liberties. I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments by those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations. Liberty may be endangered by the abuse of liberty, but also by the abuse of power. All men having power ought to be mistrusted. -- James Madison, Federalist Papers and other sources: http://www.constitution.org/jm/jm_quotes.htm RESIST THE LURE OF THE RING ALL YE WITH POLITICAL OR JUDICIAL POWER!

  3. My dear Mr Smith, I respect your opinions and much enjoy your posts here. We do differ on our view of the benefits and viability of the American Experiment in Ordered Liberty. While I do agree that it could be better, and that your points in criticism are well taken, Utopia does indeed mean nowhere. I think Madison, Jefferson, Adams and company got it about as good as it gets in a fallen post-Enlightenment social order. That said, a constitution only protects the citizens if it is followed. We currently have a bevy of public officials and judicial agents who believe that their subjectivism, their personal ideology, their elitist fears and concerns and cause celebs trump the constitutions of our forefathers. This is most troubling. More to follow in the next post on that subject.

  4. Yep I am not Bryan Brown. Bryan you appear to be a bigger believer in the Constitution than I am. Were I still a big believer then I might be using my real name like you. Personally, I am no longer a fan of secularism. I favor the confessional state. In religious mattes, it seems to me that social diversity is chaos and conflict, while uniformity is order and peace.... secularism has been imposed by America on other nations now by force and that has not exactly worked out very well.... I think the American historical experiment with disestablishmentarianism is withering on the vine before our eyes..... Since I do not know if that is OK for an officially licensed lawyer to say, I keep the nom de plume.

  5. I am compelled to announce that I am not posting under any Smith monikers here. That said, the post below does have a certain ring to it that sounds familiar to me: http://www.catholicnewworld.com/cnwonline/2014/0907/cardinal.aspx

ADVERTISEMENT