ILNews

Opinions June 14, 2012

June 14, 2012
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

7th Circuit Court of Appeals posted no Indiana opinions at IL deadline.

Indiana Supreme Court and Indiana Tax Court posted no opinions at IL deadline.

Indiana Court of Appeals

In Re the Term. of the Parent-Child Rel. of: C.V., O.V., and J.V. and G.J. v. The Indiana Dept. of Child Services (NFP)
10A01-1111-JT-516
Juvenile. Affirms termination of parental rights.

Ronald G. Becker v. State of Indiana (NFP)
45A03-1112-CR-539
Criminal. Affirms order vacating a determination that Becker was entitled to relief from reporting and registration requirements applicable to a sexually violent predator.

Darrell Warren v. State of Indiana (NFP)
29A02-1112-CR-1198
Criminal. Affirms sentence of Class D felony invasion of privacy.

Eddie R. Smith, Jr. v. State of Indiana (NFP)
34A04-1112-CR-658
Criminal. Affirms sentence following guilty plea to Class D felony failure to register as a sex offender.

In the Matter of the Adoption of M.L.B. v. K.J.R. and P.L.R. (NFP)
41A05-1107-AD-363
Adoption. Affirms order granting stepfather P.L.R.’s petition to adopt M.L.B.

Salvador S. Castro v. State of Indiana (NFP)
39A04-1107-CR-344
Criminal. Affirms trial court decision to not suspend any portion of Castro’s sentence for Class A felonies dealing cocaine and conspiracy to commit dealing cocaine and Class A misdemeanor carrying a handgun without a license.

Adam Mittler v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A05-1112-CR-623
Criminal. Vacates portion of the trial court order that failed to credit Mittler’s time on home detention against his sentence and remands with instructions to calculate the time Mittler served in home detention and to credit such time against his sentence.

In Re: The Visitation of M.L.B.; K.J.R. v. M.A.B. (NFP)
41A01-1107-MI-285
Miscellaneous. Affirms order granting grandfather M.A.B.’s petition for visitation rights to M.L.B.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Such things are no more elections than those in the late, unlamented Soviet Union.

  2. It appears the police and prosecutors are allowed to change the rules halfway through the game to suit themselves. I am surprised that the congress has not yet eliminated the right to a trial in cases involving any type of forensic evidence. That would suit their foolish law and order police state views. I say we eliminate the statute of limitations for crimes committed by members of congress and other government employees. Of course they would never do that. They are all corrupt cowards!!!

  3. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  4. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  5. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

ADVERTISEMENT