ILNews

Opinions June 14, 2012

June 14, 2012
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

7th Circuit Court of Appeals posted no Indiana opinions at IL deadline.

Indiana Supreme Court and Indiana Tax Court posted no opinions at IL deadline.

Indiana Court of Appeals

In Re the Term. of the Parent-Child Rel. of: C.V., O.V., and J.V. and G.J. v. The Indiana Dept. of Child Services (NFP)
10A01-1111-JT-516
Juvenile. Affirms termination of parental rights.

Ronald G. Becker v. State of Indiana (NFP)
45A03-1112-CR-539
Criminal. Affirms order vacating a determination that Becker was entitled to relief from reporting and registration requirements applicable to a sexually violent predator.

Darrell Warren v. State of Indiana (NFP)
29A02-1112-CR-1198
Criminal. Affirms sentence of Class D felony invasion of privacy.

Eddie R. Smith, Jr. v. State of Indiana (NFP)
34A04-1112-CR-658
Criminal. Affirms sentence following guilty plea to Class D felony failure to register as a sex offender.

In the Matter of the Adoption of M.L.B. v. K.J.R. and P.L.R. (NFP)
41A05-1107-AD-363
Adoption. Affirms order granting stepfather P.L.R.’s petition to adopt M.L.B.

Salvador S. Castro v. State of Indiana (NFP)
39A04-1107-CR-344
Criminal. Affirms trial court decision to not suspend any portion of Castro’s sentence for Class A felonies dealing cocaine and conspiracy to commit dealing cocaine and Class A misdemeanor carrying a handgun without a license.

Adam Mittler v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A05-1112-CR-623
Criminal. Vacates portion of the trial court order that failed to credit Mittler’s time on home detention against his sentence and remands with instructions to calculate the time Mittler served in home detention and to credit such time against his sentence.

In Re: The Visitation of M.L.B.; K.J.R. v. M.A.B. (NFP)
41A01-1107-MI-285
Miscellaneous. Affirms order granting grandfather M.A.B.’s petition for visitation rights to M.L.B.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. What is this, the Ind Supreme Court thinking that there is a separation of powers and limited enumerated powers as delegated by a dusty old document? Such eighteen century thinking, so rare and unwanted by the elites in this modern age. Dictate to us, dictate over us, the massess are chanting! George Soros agrees. Time to change with times Ind Supreme Court, says all President Snows. Rule by executive decree is the new black.

  2. I made the same argument before a commission of the Indiana Supreme Court and then to the fedeal district and federal appellate courts. Fell flat. So very glad to read that some judges still beleive that evidentiary foundations matter.

  3. KUDOS to the Indiana Supreme Court for realizing that some bureacracies need to go to the stake. Recall what RWR said: "No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we'll ever see on this earth!" NOW ... what next to this rare and inspiring chopping block? Well, the Commission on Gender and Race (but not religion!?!) is way overdue. And some other Board's could be cut with a positive for State and the reputation of the Indiana judiciary.

  4. During a visit where an informant with police wears audio and video, does the video necessary have to show hand to hand transaction of money and narcotics?

  5. I will agree with that as soon as law schools stop lying to prospective students about salaries and employment opportunities in the legal profession. There is no defense to the fraudulent numbers first year salaries they post to mislead people into going to law school.

ADVERTISEMENT