7th Circuit Court of Appeals posted no Indiana opinions at IL deadline.
Indiana Supreme Court and Indiana Tax Court posted no opinions at IL deadline.
Indiana Court of Appeals
In
Re the Term. of the Parent-Child Rel. of: C.V., O.V., and J.V. and G.J. v. The Indiana Dept. of Child Services (NFP)
10A01-1111-JT-516
Juvenile. Affirms termination of parental rights.
Ronald
G. Becker v. State of Indiana (NFP)
45A03-1112-CR-539
Criminal. Affirms order vacating a determination that Becker was entitled to relief from reporting and registration requirements
applicable to a sexually violent predator.
Darrell
Warren v. State of Indiana (NFP)
29A02-1112-CR-1198
Criminal. Affirms sentence of Class D felony invasion of privacy.
Eddie R. Smith, Jr. v. State of Indiana (NFP)
34A04-1112-CR-658
Criminal. Affirms sentence following guilty plea to Class D felony failure to register as a sex offender.
In
the Matter of the Adoption of M.L.B. v. K.J.R. and P.L.R. (NFP)
41A05-1107-AD-363
Adoption. Affirms order granting stepfather P.L.R.’s petition to adopt M.L.B.
Salvador
S. Castro v. State of Indiana (NFP)
39A04-1107-CR-344
Criminal. Affirms trial court decision to not suspend any portion of Castro’s sentence for Class A felonies dealing
cocaine and conspiracy to commit dealing cocaine and Class A misdemeanor carrying a handgun without a license.
Adam
Mittler v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A05-1112-CR-623
Criminal. Vacates portion of the trial court order that failed to credit Mittler’s time on home detention against his
sentence and remands with instructions to calculate the time Mittler served in home detention and to credit such time against
his sentence.
In
Re: The Visitation of M.L.B.; K.J.R. v. M.A.B. (NFP)
41A01-1107-MI-285
Miscellaneous. Affirms order granting grandfather M.A.B.’s petition for visitation rights to M.L.B.
on Facebook & Twitter
Back to Top
Interesting that the new laws in criminal code all involve voter fraud
I'm getting divorced and we have prenuptial and judge said it stands even though he made me sign it 2 days before wedding then I be c ame ill and left with nothing butbills
No irony here, John. Conour’s clients are wise to him. Evidently you’ve missed discovery that disclosed Conour was aware he was caught with his hand in the cookie jar, actually many cookie jars, but continued to spend any monies he secured on himself and his lifestyle. Your theory is idealistic and assumes Conour has the soul of a good attorney and therefore he would take care of his clients. Conour has no soul. He greedily took awarded settlements from his disabled clients and spent it on his own edacious desires. You are naïve to think if he kept working he would put his fees into a restitution fund. He is who he is and has proven he will use any means to cheat and manipulate those who trust him and the judicial system that is supposed to protect them. Sorry John, you don’t send the fox back into the hen house after he’s caught devouring the hens. Conour can’t be trusted. He has no more honor than that fox.
The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution