7th Circuit Court of Appeals posted no Indiana opinions prior to IL deadline.
Indiana Supreme Court and Tax Court posted no opinions prior to IL deadline.
Indiana Court of Appeals
David
Ashabranner v. Sandy Wilkins, f/k/a Ashabranner
22A01-1109-DR-411
Domestic relations. Affirms in part and remands in part. Affirms the trial court’s denial of emancipation of a child
and remands for recalculation of child support payments, adjusting to include payment from the mother as well as the father.
Term.
of Parent-Child Rel. of H.K., Ta.K., and Ty.K., (Minor Children), and R.K., Their Mother, and D.K., Their Father; R.K. (Mother)
v. The Indiana Dept. of Child Services
42A05-1109-JT-548
Juvenile. Remands with instructions for the trial court to determine whether the mother received proper notice of a Knox
County DCS hearing that terminated her parental rights, and if so whether the mother’s due process rights were violated.
Otoniel
Muro-Esparza v. State of Indiana (NFP)
79A05-1111-CR-589
Criminal. Affirms convictions of and sentences for Class B felonies conspiracy to commit robbery and robbery, and Class D
felony theft.
Dale
Douglas Perkins, Jr. v. State of Indiana (NFP)
16A01-1112-CR-603
Criminal. Affirms sentence for Class D felony operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated and Class D felony resisting law
enforcement.














I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.