ILNews

Opinions June 16, 2010

June 16, 2010
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Supreme Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.

Indiana Court of Appeals

M.T. v. State of Indiana
49A04-0908-JV-484
Juvenile. Reverses modification of probation and commitment to the Department of Correction. The state presented no evidence of the probation violations it alleged and the state violated M.T.’s due process rights.

Jason G. Ertel v. State of Indiana
29A02-0908-CR-824
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class C misdemeanor operating a vehicle while intoxicated. The trial court didn’t abuse its discretion by admitting evidence obtained after Ertel’s car was stopped because the police officer had reasonable suspicion to conduct an investigatory stop.

John Dyer, David White, and Maurice Dillender v. James H. Hall and Nu-Plaza Yacht Club

82A01-0910-CV-510
Civil. Reverses summary judgment in favor of Hall on the complaint his boat docks interfere with Dyer, White, and Dillender’s use of the river. There is an issue of fact as to whether or to what extent the landowners have access to the river, and whether the deadmen installed on the landowners’ property are a nuisance or a trespass.

Paternity of R.M.; N.C. v. K.M. (NFP)
02A03-1001-JP-21
Juvenile. Affirms order denying father N.C.’s motion for change of venue from judge pursuant to Indiana Trial Rule 76(B).

David Mazhandu v. State of Indiana (NFP)

49A02-0909-CR-890
Criminal. Affirms conviction of resisting law enforcement as a Class A misdemeanor.

James D. Boyd v. State of Indiana (NFP)
90A04-1001-CR-30
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A felony child molesting. Reverses sentence and remands for it to be revised to 40 years in prison.

Rocky D. Beavers Jr. v. State of Indiana (NFP)
79A02-1002-CR-96
Criminal. Affirms sentence following guilty plea to Class A felony child molesting and Class B felony incest.

Herman F. Filice v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-0911-CR-1109
Criminal. Affirms denial of motion to “remove sexually violent predator status.”

J.M. Alleged to be C.H.I.N.S.; H.M. and D.M. v. I.D.C.S. (NFP)
20A03-0910-JV-480
Juvenile. Affirms finding that J.M. is a child in need of services.

Michael R. Pollard, Jr. v. State of Indiana (NFP)

45A05-0910-CR-594
Criminal. Affirms sentence following guilty plea to Class B felony dealing in cocaine.

Rickey D. Gosha v. State of Indiana (NFP)

48A02-0910-CR-1006
Criminal. Affirms revocation of probation and order that Gosha serve the remainder of his sentence.

Lorenzo Borders v. City of Elkhart, Ind., et al. (NFP)
20A03-0907-CV-346
Civil. Affirms summary judgment and motions to dismiss Borders’ complaint for false arrest and false imprisonment in favor of the City of Elkhart, et al.

George Cox, et al. v. Honorable Roger D. Davis (NFP)
31A01-0912-CV-571
Civil. Affirms dismissal of complaint filed by Cox and others against Harrison Superior Judge Davis.

Jason Wells v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1004-CR-377
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class C felony child molesting.

James A. Barber v. State of Indiana (NFP)
29A02-0909-CR-916
Criminal. Affirms sentence following guilty plea to two counts of child molestation as Class A felonies, and two counts of sexual misconduct with a minor as Class B felonies.

Larry Andrew Anderson v. State of Indiana (NFP)
82A04-0911-CR-656
Criminal. Affirms sentence following guilty plea to Class D felony possession of a controlled substance and Class D felony possession of a legend drug.

Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by
2015 Distinguished Barrister &
Up and Coming Lawyer Reception

Tuesday, May 5, 2015 • 4:30 - 7:00 pm
Learn More


ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. A traditional parade of attorneys? Really Evansville? Y'all need to get out more. When is the traditional parade of notaries? Nurses? Sanitation workers? Pole dancers? I gotta wonder, do throngs of admiring citizens gather to laud these marching servants of the constitution? "Show us your billing records!!!" Hoping some video gets posted. Ours is not a narcissistic profession by any chance, is it? Nah .....

  2. My previous comment not an aside at court. I agree with smith. Good call. Just thought posting here a bit on the if it bleeds it leads side. Most attorneys need to think of last lines of story above.

  3. Hello everyone I'm Gina and I'm here for the exact same thing you are. I have the wonderful joy of waking up every morning to my heart being pulled out and sheer terror of what DCS is going to Throw at me and my family today.Let me start from the !bebeginning.My daughter lost all rights to her 3beautiful children due to Severe mental issues she no longer lives in our state and has cut all ties.DCS led her to belive that once she done signed over her right the babies would be with their family. We have faught screamed begged and anything else we could possibly due I hired a lawyer five grand down the drain.You know all I want is my babies home.I've done everything they have even asked me to do.Now their saying I can't see my grandchildren cause I'M on a prescription for paipain.I have a very rare blood disease it causes cellulitis a form of blood poisoning to stay dormant in my tissues and nervous system it also causes a ,blood clotting disorder.even with the two blood thinners I'm on I still Continue to develop them them also.DCS knows about my illness and still they refuse to let me see my grandchildren. I Love and miss them so much Please can anyone help Us my grandchildren and I they should be worrying about what toy there going to play with but instead there worrying about if there ever coming home again.THANK YOU DCS FOR ALL YOU'VE DONE. ( And if anyone at all has any ideals or knows who can help. Please contact (765)960~5096.only serious callers

  4. He must be a Rethuglican, for if from the other side of the aisle such acts would be merely personal and thus not something that attaches to his professional life. AND ... gotta love this ... oh, and on top of talking dirty on the phone, he also, as an aside, guess we should mention, might be important, not sure, but .... "In addition to these allegations, Keaton was accused of failing to file an appeal after he collected advance payment from a client seeking to challenge a ruling that the client repay benefits because of unreported income." rimshot

  5. I am not a fan of some of the 8.4 discipline we have seen for private conduct-- but this was so egregious and abusive and had so many points of bad conduct relates to the law and the lawyer's status as a lawyer that it is clearly a proper and just disbarment. A truly despicable account of bad acts showing unfit character to practice law. I applaud the outcome.

ADVERTISEMENT