ILNews

Opinions June 17, 2014

June 17, 2014
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Court of Appeals
Cruisin', Inc., d/b/a Cruisin' Auto Sales v. Springleaf Financial Services of Indiana, Inc., f/k/a American General Financial Services
39A01-1309-CC-423
Civil collection. Affirms judgment in favor of Springleaf. Finds Cruisin’ breached the terms of the contract by giving the title to the car buyer rather than mailing it to Springleaf. Remands to correct a scrivener’s error and enter the reimbursement amount at $2,659.02. Also remands to enter the judgment damage award against the dealership and buyer jointly and severally.

Valle Vista Limited, LLC v. Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina (NFP)
41A05-1309-PL-481
Civil Plenary. Affirms trial court’s judgment enforcing the terms of an agreement that Selective would pay no more $500,000 to Valle Vista for hail damage. Also affirms lower court’s dismissal of Valle Vista’s lawsuit claiming Selective must turn over the total amount of $616,587.79 which was awarded by an umpire.  

Christopher Carlisle v. State of Indiana (NFP)
06A01-1308-CR-352
Criminal. Affirms Carlisle’s conviction of domestic battery, a Class D felony.

Dustin Perkins v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1312-CR-1001
Criminal. Affirms Perkins’s convictions of murder and Class C felony robbery.

Kent A. Easley v. State of Indiana (NFP)
73A04-1311-PC-566
Post conviction. Affirms post-conviction court’s dismissal of Easley’s successive petition for post-conviction relief.

Cornelius Hines v. State of Indiana (NFP)
52A05-1312-CR-594
Criminal. Affirms convictions for Class C felony criminal confinement, and Class D felony battery.

Trevor Nash Tice v. State of Indiana (NFP)
15A01-1307-CR-301
Criminal. Affirms conviction and 12-year sentence for child molesting, a Class B felony.

Indiana Supreme Court and Indiana Tax Court posted no opinions by IL deadline. The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals posted no Indiana opinions by IL deadline.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. It's an appreciable step taken by the government to curb the child abuse that are happening in the schools. Employees in the schools those are selected without background check can not be trusted. A thorough background check on the teachers or any other other new employees must be performed to choose the best and quality people. Those who are already employed in the past should also be checked for best precaution. The future of kids can be saved through this simple process. However, the checking process should be conducted by the help of a trusted background checking agency(https://www.affordablebackgroundchecks.com/).

  2. Almost everything connects to internet these days. From your computers and Smartphones to wearable gadgets and smart refrigerators in your home, everything is linked to the Internet. Although this convenience empowers usto access our personal devices from anywhere in the world such as an IP camera, it also deprives control of our online privacy. Cyber criminals, hackers, spies and everyone else has realized that we don’t have complete control on who can access our personal data. We have to take steps to to protect it like keeping Senseless password. Dont leave privacy unprotected. Check out this article for more ways: https://www.purevpn.com/blog/data-privacy-in-the-age-of-internet-of-things/

  3. You need to look into Celadon not paying sign on bonuses. We call get the run

  4. My parents took advantage of the fact that I was homeless in 2012 and went to court and got Legal Guardianship I my 2 daughters. I am finally back on my feet and want them back, but now they want to fight me on it. I want to raise my children and have them almost all the time on the weekends. Mynparents are both almost 70 years old and they play favorites which bothers me a lot. Do I have a leg to stand on if I go to court to terminate lehal guardianship? My kids want to live with me and I want to raise them, this was supposed to be temporary, and now it is turning into a fight. Ridiculous

  5. Here's my two cents. While in Texas in 2007 I was not registered because I only had to do it for ten years. So imagine my surprise as I find myself forced to register in Texas because indiana can't get their head out of their butt long enough to realize they passed an ex post facto law in 2006. So because Indiana had me listed as a failure to register Texas said I had to do it there. Now if Indiana had done right by me all along I wouldn't need the aclu to defend my rights. But such is life.

ADVERTISEMENT