The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals’ website was unavailable at IL deadline.
Indiana Supreme Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Philip
Cleer v. State of Indiana
49A02-0912-CR-1193
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class C misdemeanor operating a vehicle with a blood alcohol content between 0.08 and 0.15.
Cleer didn’t establish that the operation of a sobriety checkpoint violates the separation of powers provision of the
Indiana Constitution.
Leo
D. Youngblood v. State of Indiana (NFP)
48A02-0911-CR-1114
Criminal. Affirms sentence following guilty plea to Class B felony dealing in cocaine.
Randolph
Bishop v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A04-0911-CR-653
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class C felony battery and Class A misdemeanor domestic battery.
Cherrice
Avant v. State of Indiana (NFP)
29A05-1002-CR-64
Criminal. Affirms Class D felony theft conviction.
Bradley
Baker v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A04-0910-CR-611
Criminal. Affirms convictions of two counts of Class C felony failure to register as a sex offender.
Guardianship
of Carrie Etta McGoffney, an Incapacitated Adult (NFP)
84A01-0906-CV-266
Civil. Affirms appointment of Ivy McGoffney as guardian over her mother, Carrie Etta McGoffney.
Kassahun T. Metaferia v. John Ancelet (NFP)
49A02-0908-CV-813
Civil. Affirms jury verdict in favor of Ancelet that concluded Metaferia was 65 percent at fault for the car accident. Metaferia
isn’t entitled to a new trial.
Marcel
Roundtree v. State of Indiana (NFP)
18A04-0910-CR-577
Criminal. Affirms convictions of theft and possession of a controlled substance as Class D felonies.
Richard A. Brown v. Mary Brown Whitledge (NFP)
82A01-0912-CV-608
Civil. Affirms grant of petition to modify child custody filed by Whitledge.
Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.














The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.