ILNews

Opinions June 24, 2011

June 24, 2011
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Supreme Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Involuntary Commitment of S.S.
49A02-1011-MH-1251
Mental health. Affirms order for S.S.’s temporary commitment. There was no prejudice to S.S. due to the doctor’s report being filed 16 minutes after the end of her detention period. The timely filing of the report is a procedural requirement, not a jurisdiction prerequisite.  

Aaron Shields v. State of Indiana (NFP)
29A04-1009-CR-558
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class C felony forgery.

Robert A. Hutchens v. BAC Home Loans Servicing (NFP)
29A02-1010-MF-1085
Mortgage foreclosure. Affirms summary judgment for BAC Home Loans Servicing on its foreclosure claim against Hutchens, and for Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems and Bank of America National Association as to Hutchens’ claims that the parties should have filed a satisfaction of mortgage on Hutchens’ home equity line of credit.  

Terry Allen Wagster v. State of Indiana (NFP)
45A03-1011-CR-590
Criminal. Affirms sentence following guilty plea to two counts of Class C felony exploitation of an endangered adult.

Jomisha Williams v. State of Indiana (NFP)
71A03-1011-CR-578
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class C felony possession of cocaine.

Term. of Parent-Child Rel. of Dam.T., et al.; K.T. v. I.D.C.S. (NFP)
49A05-1010-JT-694
Juvenile. Affirms involuntary termination of parental rights.

Timothy L. Woods v. State of Indiana (NFP)
02A04-1011-CR-752
Criminal. Affirms sentence following guilty plea to Class D felony receiving stolen property.

Lee Kershaw v. State of Indiana (NFP)
10A01-1011-CR-572
Criminal. Affirms sentence for Class A felony voluntary manslaughter and Class A felony attempted voluntary manslaughter.

Fernando B. Eguia, Sr. v. State of Indiana (NFP)
01A05-1010-CR-627
Criminal. Affirms conviction of and sentence for Class D felony intimidation.

Elijah Roberson v. State of Indiana (NFP)
45A03-1011-CR-564
Criminal. Affirms sentence following guilty plea to Class A felony child molesting.

Joseph A. Taylor v. Mitch Daniels, et al. (NFP)
67A01-1011-MI-600
Miscellaneous. Reverses denial of Taylor’s amended complaint against Gov. Mitch Daniels and other defendants.

Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Indianapolis employers harassment among minorities AFRICAN Americans needs to be discussed the metro Indianapolis area is horrible when it comes to harassing African American employees especially in the local healthcare facilities. Racially profiling in the workplace is an major issue. Please make it better because I'm many civil rights leaders would come here and justify that Indiana is a state the WORKS only applies to Caucasian Americans especially in Hamilton county. Indiana targets African Americans in the workplace so when governor pence is trying to convince people to vote for him this would be awesome publicity for the Presidency Elections.

  2. Wishing Mary Willis only God's best, and superhuman strength, as she attempts to right a ship that too often strays far off course. May she never suffer this personal affect, as some do who attempt to change a broken system: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QojajMsd2nE

  3. Indiana's seatbelt law is not punishable as a crime. It is an infraction. Apparently some of our Circuit judges have deemed settled law inapplicable if it fails to fit their litmus test of political correctness. Extrapolating to redefine terms of behavior in a violation of immigration law to the entire body of criminal law leaves a smorgasbord of opportunity for judicial mischief.

  4. I wonder if $10 diversions for failure to wear seat belts are considered moral turpitude in federal immigration law like they are under Indiana law? Anyone know?

  5. What a fine article, thank you! I can testify firsthand and by detailed legal reports (at end of this note) as to the dire consequences of rejecting this truth from the fine article above: "The inclusion and expansion of this right [to jury] in Indiana’s Constitution is a clear reflection of our state’s intention to emphasize the importance of every Hoosier’s right to make their case in front of a jury of their peers." Over $20? Every Hoosier? Well then how about when your very vocation is on the line? How about instead of a jury of peers, one faces a bevy of political appointees, mini-czars, who care less about due process of the law than the real czars did? Instead of trial by jury, trial by ideological ordeal run by Orwellian agents? Well that is built into more than a few administrative law committees of the Ind S.Ct., and it is now being weaponized, as is revealed in articles posted at this ezine, to root out post moderns heresies like refusal to stand and pledge allegiance to all things politically correct. My career was burned at the stake for not so saluting, but I think I was just one of the early logs. Due, at least in part, to the removal of the jury from bar admission and bar discipline cases, many more fires will soon be lit. Perhaps one awaits you, dear heretic? Oh, at that Ind. article 12 plank about a remedy at law for every damage done ... ah, well, the founders evidently meant only for those damages done not by the government itself, rabid statists that they were. (Yes, that was sarcasm.) My written reports available here: Denied petition for cert (this time around): http://tinyurl.com/zdmawmw Denied petition for cert (from the 2009 denial and five year banishment): http://tinyurl.com/zcypybh Related, not written by me: Amicus brief: http://tinyurl.com/hvh7qgp

ADVERTISEMENT