ILNews

Opinions June 24, 2011

June 24, 2011
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Supreme Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Involuntary Commitment of S.S.
49A02-1011-MH-1251
Mental health. Affirms order for S.S.’s temporary commitment. There was no prejudice to S.S. due to the doctor’s report being filed 16 minutes after the end of her detention period. The timely filing of the report is a procedural requirement, not a jurisdiction prerequisite.  

Aaron Shields v. State of Indiana (NFP)
29A04-1009-CR-558
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class C felony forgery.

Robert A. Hutchens v. BAC Home Loans Servicing (NFP)
29A02-1010-MF-1085
Mortgage foreclosure. Affirms summary judgment for BAC Home Loans Servicing on its foreclosure claim against Hutchens, and for Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems and Bank of America National Association as to Hutchens’ claims that the parties should have filed a satisfaction of mortgage on Hutchens’ home equity line of credit.  

Terry Allen Wagster v. State of Indiana (NFP)
45A03-1011-CR-590
Criminal. Affirms sentence following guilty plea to two counts of Class C felony exploitation of an endangered adult.

Jomisha Williams v. State of Indiana (NFP)
71A03-1011-CR-578
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class C felony possession of cocaine.

Term. of Parent-Child Rel. of Dam.T., et al.; K.T. v. I.D.C.S. (NFP)
49A05-1010-JT-694
Juvenile. Affirms involuntary termination of parental rights.

Timothy L. Woods v. State of Indiana (NFP)
02A04-1011-CR-752
Criminal. Affirms sentence following guilty plea to Class D felony receiving stolen property.

Lee Kershaw v. State of Indiana (NFP)
10A01-1011-CR-572
Criminal. Affirms sentence for Class A felony voluntary manslaughter and Class A felony attempted voluntary manslaughter.

Fernando B. Eguia, Sr. v. State of Indiana (NFP)
01A05-1010-CR-627
Criminal. Affirms conviction of and sentence for Class D felony intimidation.

Elijah Roberson v. State of Indiana (NFP)
45A03-1011-CR-564
Criminal. Affirms sentence following guilty plea to Class A felony child molesting.

Joseph A. Taylor v. Mitch Daniels, et al. (NFP)
67A01-1011-MI-600
Miscellaneous. Reverses denial of Taylor’s amended complaint against Gov. Mitch Daniels and other defendants.

Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. @BryanJBrown, You are totally correct. I have no words, you nailed it.....

  2. You have not overstated the reality of the present situation. The government inquisitor in my case, who demanded that I, on the record, to choose between obedience to God's law or man's law, remains on the BLE, even an officer of the BLE, and was recently renewed in her contract for another four years. She has a long history in advancing LGBQT rights. http://www.realjock.com/article/1071 THINK WITH ME: What if a currently serving BLE officer or analogous court official (ie discplinary officer) asked an atheist to affirm the Existence, or demanded a transsexual to undergo a mental evaluation to probe his/her alleged mindcrime? That would end a career. The double standard is glaring, see the troubling question used to ban me for life from the Ind bar right here: https://www.scribd.com/doc/312841269/Thomas-More-Society-Amicus-Brown-v-Ind-Bd-of-Law-Examiners (see page 8 of 21) Again, what if I had been a homosexual rights activist before law school rather than a prolife activist? A gay rights activist after law school admitted to the SCOTUS and Kansas since 1996, without discipline? A homosexual rights activist who had argued before half the federal appellate courts in the country? I am pretty certain that had I been that LGBQT activist, and not a pro-life activist, my passing of the Indiana bar exam would have rendered me an Indiana attorney .... rather than forever banished. So yes, there is a glaring double standard. And some are even beyond the reach of constitutional and statutory protections. I was.

  3. Historically speaking pagans devalue children and worship animals. How close are we? Consider the ruling above plus today's tidbit from the politically correct high Court: http://indianacourts.us/times/2016/12/are-you-asking-the-right-questions-intimate-partner-violence-and-pet-abuse/

  4. The father is a convicted of spousal abuse. 2 restaining orders been put on him, never made any difference the whole time she was there. The time he choked the mother she dropped the baby the police were called. That was the only time he was taken away. The mother was suppose to have been notified when he was released no call was ever made. He made his way back, kicked the door open and terrified the mother. She ran down the hallway and locked herself and the baby in the bathroom called 911. The police came and said there was nothing they could do (the policeman was a old friend from highschool, good ole boy thing).They told her he could burn the place down as long as she wasn't in it.The mother got another resataining order, the judge told her if you were my daughter I would tell you to leave. So she did. He told her "If you ever leave me I will make your life hell, you don't know who your f!@#$%^ with". The fathers other 2 grown children from his 1st exwife havent spoke 1 word to him in almost 15yrs not 1 word.This is what will be a forsure nightmare for this little girl who is in the hands of pillar of the community. Totally corrupt system. Where I come from I would be in jail not only for that but non payment of child support. Unbelievably pitiful...

  5. dsm 5 indicates that a lot of kids with gender dysphoria grow out of it. so is it really a good idea to encourage gender reassignment? Perhaps that should wait for the age of majority. I don't question the compassionate motives of many of the trans-advocates, but I do question their wisdom. Likewise, they should not question the compassion of those whose potty policies differ. too often, any opposition to the official GLBT agenda is instantly denounced as "homophobia" etc.

ADVERTISEMENT