The following Indiana Supreme Court opinion was posted after IL deadline Tuesday:
Michael
Sharp v. State of Indiana
12S02-1109-CR-544
Criminal. Affirms sentence for two counts of child molesting, one as a Class A felony and one as a Class C felony. Holds
that credit time status may be considered by an appellate court exercising its review and revise authority. Finds that Sharp’s
sentence of 40 years, with a minimum possible sentence of 34.29 years after taking into account credit time, is appropriate.
Wednesday’s opinions
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
A.B.,
a child by his next friend, Linda Kehoe v. Housing Authority of South Bend
11-2581
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division, Chief Judge Philip P. Simon.
Civil. Dismisses appeal of the order denying A.B.’s motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent the housing authority
from pursuing the eviction in state court. Since A.B. has already been evicted, the appeal is moot.
Indiana Supreme Court and Indiana Tax Court posted no opinions at IL deadline.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Gunther
Kranz and Carol Kranz v. Meyers Subdivision Property Owners Association, Inc., Christopher Bartoszek, and Indiana Dept. of
Natural Resources
75A03-1112-PL-577
Civil plenary. Affirms trial court affirmation of the decision by the administrative law judge that easement holders should
be allowed to have a group pier on Bass Lake and the Kranzes should move their pier to accommodate the group pier. The Natural
Resources Commission has jurisdiction to render a decision regarding property rights to the extent necessary to implement
the permit process and the only effect of the NRC’s decision on the Kranzes’ property rights was to relocate the
pier. The pier was no less usable in the location chosen by the NRC.
Fili
Moala v. State of Indiana
49A02-1109-CR-870
Criminal. Reverses conviction of Class C misdemeanor operating a vehicle while intoxicated due to double jeopardy violations.
The operating while intoxicated conviction has the less severe penal consequences. Affirms conviction of Class B misdemeanor
public intoxication. Remands with instructions to vacate the Class C misdemeanor conviction.
Cory
Heinzman v. State of Indiana
29A02-1012-CR-1327
Criminal. Affirms convictions of three counts of Class C felony child molesting in one cause and conviction following guilty
plea to Class D felony sexual battery in another cause. The delay in Heinzman’s trial did not violate his constitutional
right to a speedy trial, the admission of certain evidence was allowed, and there is no error in his sentence.














The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.