7th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals
Robert
Jones v. C&D Technologies, Inc.
1:10-cv-696
Civil plenary. Affirms summary judgment for C&D Technologies, Inc. granted by U.S. District Court for the Southern District
of Indiana, upholding that Jones was not entitled to benefits from the Family and Medical Leave Act because he did not receive
treatment during his absence.
Indiana Supreme Court and Indiana Tax Court posted no opinions at IL deadline.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Eldon
E. Harmon v. State of Indiana
20A03-1110-CR-529
Criminal. Reverses and remands to Elkhart Superior Court with instructions to reduce a Class A felony conviction of dealing
in methamphetamine to a Class B felony and resentence Harmon accordingly. The court found that the state failed to properly
satisfy its burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt with respect to the 3-gram weight element of the Class A felony charge.
James
Henry Tankard v. State of Indiana (NFP)
02A04-1110-CR-570
Criminal. Affirms an Allen Superior Court conviction and 17-year sentence on a charge of Class B felony dealing in cocaine.
Judges found the trial court did not err on instructions regarding “delivery” after Tankard sold cocaine to an
undercover officer and was arrested a short time late. Tankard also failed to prove the evidence was insufficient to support
his conviction and the sentence was inappropriate, according to the ruling.
Anthony
Hall v. State of Indiana (NFP)
87A01-1110-CR-498
Criminal. Affirms Warrick Superior Court convictions of Class B felony confinement, Class D felony criminal recklessness,
and Class A misdemeanors invasion of privacy and domestic battery. The court held that Hall did not demonstrate fundamental
error and that the incredible dubiosity rule does not apply.
Constance
L. Jones v. Jean L. Markey d/b/a Markey Bonding d/b/a Markey Bonds d/b/a A-AAA Bail Bonds, Inc. (NFP)
02A05-1110-SC-534
Small claims. Affirms an Allen Superior Court judgment for Markey Bonds, holding that the trial court did not err in refusing
to order refund of a bail bond, after which the plaintiff’s son was immediately arrested on separate charges.
Steven
Kamp v. State of Indiana (NFP)
66A05-1109-PC-485
Criminal. Affirms denial of post-conviction relief for a Pulaski Superior Court conviction and eight-year sentence on a Class
C felony charge of child molestation, holding that Kamp failed to prove his counsel failed to investigate or that an investigation
would have produced evidence with a reasonable probability of affecting the trial outcome.
Timothy
J. Canfield v. State of Indiana (NFP)
15A01-1112-CR-576
Criminal. Affirms a Dearborn Superior Court ruling, holding the court did not abuse its discretion by requiring Canfield,
after he violated in-home detention, to serve two years of his sentence for burglary that previously had been suspended.
Joseph
A. Taylor v. Commissioner, Indiana Department of Correction, Indiana Parole Board, Keith Butts (NFP)
48A02-1202-PL-163
Civil plenary. Affirms a Madison Circuit Court ruling denying a Pendleton Correctional Facility inmate’s amended complaint,
ruling than the plaintiff’s incomplete record on appeal failed to demonstrate prejudice required for a reversible error.














vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.