ILNews

Opinions June 7, 2011

June 7, 2011
Keywords
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Supreme Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.

Indiana Court of Appeals
Michael J. Gaby v. State of Indiana
79A02-1006-CR-804
Criminal. Reverses conviction of Class A felony child molesting and remands for new trial, stating the trial court erred in permitting the state to refresh the victim’s recollection by allowing her to read a previous statement she made. Holds that retrial will not violate double jeopardy grounds because sufficient evidence exists to support conviction.

Uniontown Retail #36, LLC, d/b/a The Lion's Den #36 v. Board of Commissioners of Jackson County
36A01-1008-MI-434
Miscellaneous. Affirms trial court’s order granting motion for summary judgment filed by the Board of Commissioners of Jackson County and permanently enjoining Uniontown Retail, doing business as The Lion’s Den, from operating a sexually oriented business at its current location. The Lion’s Den did not satisfy its burden of demonstrating that the ordinances are constitutionally overbroad.

Patrick Jackson v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1009-CR-1031
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class C felony battery.

A.R. v. State of Indiana (NFP)
03A04-1012-JV-786
Juvenile. Affirms adjudication finding A.R. to be delinquent.

Term. of Parent-Child Rel. of R.L.; C.L. v. I.D.C.S. (NFP)
05A02-1012-JT-1411
Juvenile. Affirms termination of mother’s parental rights.

Edward L. Weaver v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1009-CR-954
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class B felony burglary.

Owen Cobbum, et al. v. Town of Cromwell (NFP)
57A03-1009-PL-486
Civil plenary. Affirms trial court’s judgment in favor of the Town of Cromwell.

Joshua Garrard v. State of Indiana (NFP)
55A01-1101-CR-10
Criminal. Affirms sentence for Class D felony theft.

Jason Q. Daugherty v. State of Indiana (NFP)
69A05-1011-CR-743
Criminal. Affirms conviction of and sentence for Class B felony conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine.

Phillip Spratt v. State of Indiana (NFP)
79A02-1006-CR-667
Criminal. Vacates conviction of Class B felony possession of cocaine. Affirms convictions of two counts of Class A felony dealing in cocaine and revises sentence to two concurrent 30-year sentences.

Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Hail to our Constitutional Law Expert in the Executive Office! “What you’re not paying attention to is the fact that I just took an action to change the law,” Obama said.

  2. What is this, the Ind Supreme Court thinking that there is a separation of powers and limited enumerated powers as delegated by a dusty old document? Such eighteen century thinking, so rare and unwanted by the elites in this modern age. Dictate to us, dictate over us, the massess are chanting! George Soros agrees. Time to change with times Ind Supreme Court, says all President Snows. Rule by executive decree is the new black.

  3. I made the same argument before a commission of the Indiana Supreme Court and then to the fedeal district and federal appellate courts. Fell flat. So very glad to read that some judges still beleive that evidentiary foundations matter.

  4. KUDOS to the Indiana Supreme Court for realizing that some bureacracies need to go to the stake. Recall what RWR said: "No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we'll ever see on this earth!" NOW ... what next to this rare and inspiring chopping block? Well, the Commission on Gender and Race (but not religion!?!) is way overdue. And some other Board's could be cut with a positive for State and the reputation of the Indiana judiciary.

  5. During a visit where an informant with police wears audio and video, does the video necessary have to show hand to hand transaction of money and narcotics?

ADVERTISEMENT