Indiana Supreme Court and Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions by IL deadline.
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Kenneth
Harper v. C.R. England, Incorporated
11-2975
U. S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division, Magistrate Judge Paul R. Cherry.
Civil. Affirms District Court’s determination that Harper failed to set forth a prima facie case, under either the
direct or indirect method of proof, to support his claim that C.R. England had retaliated against him for reporting what he
believed to be unlawful racial discrimination. Holds that his record shows excessive absences were the cause for his termination.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Michael
A. Gargano, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration, et al. v. Lee
Alan Bryant Health Care Facilities, Inc., et al.
49A02-1105-PL-449
Civil plenary. Reverses trial court’s determination that the Family and Social Services Administration had acted unlawfully
in refusing to accept applications for Residential Care Assistance Program funds after Dec. 1, 2009, holding that the agency
had acted within its power to meet budget constraints. Also reverses trial court’s finding that reimbursement rates
were unlawful and remands for further proceedings.
Tricia
L. Sexton v. Travis Sexton
34A02-1111-DR-1059
Domestic relation. Affirms the trial court’s order of emancipation of a daughter, holding that the daughter put herself
outside the care or control of her parents and was self-supporting, and that the trial court did not err in determining that
she was emancipated.
Betwel
Birari v. State of Indiana
49A02-1111-CR-1009
Criminal. Affirms trial court’s conviction of attempted rape as a class B felony, finding evidence presented at trial
was sufficient to support the conviction and that a prosecutor’s comments did not result in fundamental error.
Kent
A. Easley v. State of Indiana, Shelby County Prosecutor's Office, R. Kent Apsley, J. Brad Landwerlen, Shelby Co. Probation
Dept., Deanna Holder, Shelby Co. Superior Ct One Clerk, et al. (NFP)
49A02-1109-CT-975
Civil tort. Affirms trial court’s order dismissing Easley’s motion for default judgment.
William
A. Wiley v. State of Indiana (NFP)
48A02-1111-CR-1072
Criminal. Affirms sentence for Class B felony robbery, Class A misdemeanor criminal conversion and Class A misdemeanor battery.
Michael
Kucholick v. State of Indiana (NFP)
12A02-1109-CR-907
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class C felony criminal recklessness and Class B misdemeanor criminal mischief but reduces
sentence to advisory standard of four years, with two years suspended to probation and two years to be executed in community
corrections. Judge Edward Najam concurred in part and dissented in part.
Blake
Clunie v. State of Indiana (NFP)
31A01-1109-PC-458
Post conviction. Affirms trial court’s denial of motion to correct error in Clunie’s erroneous filing of his
petition for post-conviction relief, which was filed under the original cause number instead of the post-conviction cause
number.














With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.
In regards to bill's comment about trusting the cover meant. We can trust them about as much as we can trust attorneys'.
This is disturbing to learn...