7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United States of America v. Mario Arita-Campos
09-2368
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division, Chief Judge Philip P. Simon.
Criminal. Denies motion to dismiss Arita-Campos’ 2005 indictment of re-entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C.
Section 1326(a). He cannot establish any of the elements required under the section to collaterally attack the deportation
order underlying the offense.
Indiana Supreme Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Aaron D. Norman, Sr. v. State of Indiana (NFP)
69A01-0906-PC-275
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief and motion to correct error.
Andre Powell v. State of Indiana (NFP)
20A04-0909-PC-539
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief.
Eugene L. Echols v. State of Indiana (NFP)
84A01-1001-CR-8
Criminal. Affirms sentence for Class A felony child molesting.
Dave Huckaby v. Jasper County Sheriff's Office (NFP)
37A05-0909-CV-511
Civil. Affirms grant of Jasper County Sheriff’s Office’s motion to dismiss Huckaby’s complaint pursuant
to Indiana Trial Rule 12(B)(6).
Lance Douglas v. State of Indiana (NFP)
22A01-0907-CR-337
Criminal. Vacates Douglas’ conviction of Class A felony robbery and remands with instructions to enter it as a Class
B felony. Remands for the trial court to re-sentence him to 20 years, the statutory maximum for Class B felony robbery and
that it’s served concurrently with his Class A felony attempted burglary conviction but consecutively with his felony
murder sentence.
Christopher Hickey v. State of Indiana (NFP)
75A04-0912-CR-704
Criminal. Affirms sentence for Class B felony burglary but reverses and remands with regard to the restitution order.
James Cashman v. The Gables at Brighton Point, HOA (NFP)
53A01-0907-CV-369
Civil. Reverses award of $89.11 to The Gables against Cashman and remands that it be vacated. Affirms all other aspects of
the judgment in favor of The Gables in their suit for past dues and Cashman’s counterclaim for violating the Fair Debt
Collect Act and failing to prove the validity of the disputed finance charges and late fees.
Indiana Tax Court had posted no opinions at IL deadline.














The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.