Indiana Supreme Court
Curtis
A. Bethea v. State of Indiana
18S05-1206-PC-304
Post conviction. Affirms trial court denial of post-conviction relief, holding that Curtis Bethea, who pleaded guilty to
armed robbery and criminal confinement in a deal that dropped seven other felony counts, was not improperly denied post-conviction
relief when a judge considered evidence of charges that were dismissed.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Henry
Keith Holloway v. State of Indiana (NFP)
71A05-1202-CR-58
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class C felony operating a vehicle after lifetime suspension and Class A misdemeanor operating
a vehicle while intoxicated.
Jennifer Duff v. State of Indiana (NFP)
89A01-1206-CR-280
Criminal. Affirms aggregate executed sentence of 18 years in prison for conviction of one Class B felony count of dealing
in a Schedule I controlled substance; eight counts of Class C felony forgery; one count of Class C felony robbery; five counts
of Class D felony theft; and three counts of Class C felony fraud.
Brian L. Spurlock, Sally M. Spurlock v. Morequity, Inc. (NFP)
29A04-1207-MF-345
Mortgage foreclosure. Dismisses appeal from an entry of a foreclosure judgment against the Spurlocks.
Kevin Burrell v. State of Indiana (NFP)
71A05-1208-CR-434
Criminal. Affirms conviction and aggregate sentence of 105 years in prison for two counts of Class A felony attempted murder,
Class C felony criminal recklessness and a criminal gang activity sentence enhancement.
Kenneth D. Helton v. State of Indiana (NFP)
47A01-1205-CR-200
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class B felony dealing in methamphetamine, Class D felony possession of marijuana and Class
D felony maintaining a common nuisance, remanding to the trial court to correct a sentencing error. The appeals panel left
in place an aggregate sentence of 23 years in prison but instructed the trial court to enhance the dealing in methamphetamine
conviction by eight years instead of sentencing him separately for being a habitual substance offender.
John
Ivy v. State of Indiana (NFP)
18A02-1205-PC-378
Post conviction. Affirms denial of post-conviction relief from a 65-year sentence for a conviction of murder, concluding
the post-conviction court erred in finding that Ivy had waived two issues, but notwithstanding that error, Ivy failed to demonstrate
he was entitled to post-conviction relief on any of his claims.
Gary Gardner v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A05-1207-PC-379
Post conviction. Affirms in a divided opinion denial of post-conviction relief from a 90-year sentence for three counts of
Class A felony child molesting, one count of Class C felony child molesting, and one count of Class C felony child exploitation.
Senior Judge Betty Barteau and Judge Terry Crone formed the majority from which Judge Elaine Brown dissented, concluding that
Gardner demonstrated ineffective counsel assistance because his appellate counsel failed to raise an issue related to the
length of his sentence. Brown would find the trial court thus erred and remand for further proceedings.
Indiana Tax Court issued no opinions by IL deadline. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals issued no Indiana opinions
by IL deadline.














With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.
In regards to bill's comment about trusting the cover meant. We can trust them about as much as we can trust attorneys'.
This is disturbing to learn...