Opinions March 14, 2013

March 14, 2013
Back to TopE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Court of Appeals
Michael Bowser v. State of Indiana

Criminal. Affirms two convictions of Class C felony battery by means of a deadly weapon. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying Bowser’s motion for severance and there is sufficient evidence to sustain the convictions.

Gersh Zavodnik v. Brian Richards and a/k/a Savva's Golf Enterprises a/k/a and, Steve Panayiotov a/k/a Steve Panayiotou a/k/a Savva Panayiotou
Civil collection. Affirms dismissal of lawsuits against Giselle Guzman, Brian Richards and Steve Panayiotou. The lawsuits were similar to previous lawsuits that had been dismissed without prejudice under Indiana Trial Rule 41(E).

Sherri A. Cornejo v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development and Houchens Food Group, Inc. (NFP)
Agency action. Affirms determination Cornejo is ineligible for unemployment insurance benefits.

Citizens Financial Bank v. Richard Cooper and Peggy Cooper (NFP)

Civil plenary. Affirms grant of motion for garnishment order filed by Richard and Peggy Cooper.

Richard Lindsey v. City of Clinton, Indiana (NFP)
Miscellaneous. Affirms decision of the Police Department Merit Board for the city of Clinton to terminate Lindsey’s employment as a police officer.

John F. Minter-Bey III v. State of Indiana (NFP)

Criminal. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief.

Heath Lord v. Ashley Lord (NFP)
Protective order. Reverses denial of Heath Lord’s motion to correct error, which challenged the issuance of a protective order against him.

Bennie Chamberlain v. State of Indiana (NFP)

Criminal. Affirms sentence for Class C felonies stalking and criminal confinement, two counts of Class D felony residential entry, Class A misdemeanors battery and invasion of privacy and Chamberlain’s status as a habitual offender.

The Indiana Supreme Court and Tax Court posted no opinions by IL deadline. The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals posted no Indiana decisions by IL deadline.


Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. So the prosecutor made an error and the defendants get a full remedy. Just one short paragraph to undo the harm of the erroneous prosecution. Wow. Just wow.

  2. Wake up!!!! Lawyers are useless!! it makes no difference in any way to speak about what is important!! Just dont tell your plans to the "SELFRIGHTEOUS ARROGANT JERKS!! WHO THINK THEY ARE BETTER THAN ANOTHER MAN/WOMAN!!!!!!

  3. Looks like you dont understand Democracy, Civilized Society does not cut a thiefs hands off, becouse now he cant steal or write or feed himself or learn !!! You deserve to be over punished, Many men are mistreated hurt in many ways before a breaking point happens! grow up !!!

  4. It was all that kept us from tyranny. So sad that so few among the elite cared enough to guard the sacred trust. Nobody has a more sacred obligation to obey the law than those who make the law. Sophocles No man is above the law and no man is below it; nor do we ask any man's permission when we ask him to obey it. Obedience to the law is demanded as a right; not asked as a favor. Theodore Roosevelt That was the ideal ... here is the Hoosier reality: The King can do no wrong. Legal maxim From the Latin 'Rex non potest peccare'. When the President does it, that means that it is not illegal. Richard Nixon

  5. So men who think they are girls at heart can use the lady's potty? Usually the longer line is for the women's loo, so, the ladies may be the ones to experience temporary gender dysphoria, who knows? Is it ok to joke about his or is that hate? I may need a brainwash too, hey! I may just object to my own comment, later, if I get myself properly "oriented"