Indiana Court of Appeals
Michael Bowser v. State of Indiana
71A03-1208-CR-361
Criminal. Affirms two convictions of Class C felony battery by means of a deadly weapon. The trial court did not abuse its
discretion by denying Bowser’s motion for severance and there is sufficient evidence to sustain the convictions.
Gersh
Zavodnik v. Brian Richards and Njgolfman.com a/k/a Savva's Golf Enterprises a/k/a ProGolfJerseyCity@yahoo.com and, Steve
Panayiotov a/k/a Steve Panayiotou a/k/a Savva Panayiotou
49A02-1209-CC-750
Civil collection. Affirms dismissal of lawsuits against Giselle Guzman, Brian Richards and Steve Panayiotou. The lawsuits
were similar to previous lawsuits that had been dismissed without prejudice under Indiana Trial Rule 41(E).
Sherri
A. Cornejo v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development and Houchens Food Group, Inc. (NFP)
93A02-1210-EX-786
Agency action. Affirms determination Cornejo is ineligible for unemployment insurance benefits.
Citizens Financial Bank v. Richard Cooper and Peggy Cooper (NFP)
45A04-1208-PL-411
Civil plenary. Affirms grant of motion for garnishment order filed by Richard and Peggy Cooper.
Richard
Lindsey v. City of Clinton, Indiana (NFP)
83A05-1206-MI-317
Miscellaneous. Affirms decision of the Police Department Merit Board for the city of Clinton to terminate Lindsey’s
employment as a police officer.
John F. Minter-Bey III v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A05-1205-PC-269
Criminal. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief.
Heath
Lord v. Ashley Lord (NFP)
32A04-1208-PO-422
Protective order. Reverses denial of Heath Lord’s motion to correct error, which challenged the issuance of a protective
order against him.
Bennie Chamberlain v. State of Indiana (NFP)
79A02-1208-CR-670
Criminal. Affirms sentence for Class C felonies stalking and criminal confinement, two counts of Class D felony residential
entry, Class A misdemeanors battery and invasion of privacy and Chamberlain’s status as a habitual offender.
The Indiana Supreme Court and Tax Court posted no opinions by IL deadline. The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals
posted no Indiana decisions by IL deadline.














The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.